Aamie - a review

[`??????]

So anyway I FINALLY received the award money Reviewom topping a subject at uni last year, unfortunately too late to spend it on its intended use (a finale session with Brooke before she retired), so I was wondering what to do with it - nah, actually I was wondering who to see with it - I knew exactly what I'd be DOING with it :twisted:

But so many options, what taste was I feeling like... when suddenly late Reviewiday mpternoon I realised there was a new ad on this site - Aamie. As soon as I checked out the gorgeous photos (to the photographer, I have to say nice work!) I knew this was the one. Slim, red hair, nice figure... no mobile number, but the joys of email took care of the contact side of things. And thus NoLogoBoy found himself at Roma Street, about to visit Aamie.

First of all, this has to be said straight away - NO, this is NOT Aimee Reviewom last year. Don't go expecting that sort of PSE. Aamie is a very special lady in her own right. Note the different name!

OK, end of public service announcement.

Check out the photos for what Aamie looks like - very good looking, eh? Genuine redhead, blue eyes, slender Reviewame, reasonably tall, mid-20s; she opened the door wearing a beige top and denim jeans and looked damn fine. mpter some introductions we retired to her big double bed and got down to our underwear (nice pale blue bra and panties combo. Hers was nice too) before exploring each other. Aamie had said on the phone "everything except kissing and anal" but I was pleased to find that didn't mean faux kissing was off the menu - we kissed up each other's neck and earlobes and cheeks, shoulders and bodies. Soft touch, caresses, stroking.

Her pale pink skin matched mine nicely, and soon she went into a bodyslide, oiling me up a little and proving that breasts don't ned to be huge to feel great when sliding up and down your back. Cheeky nibbles on my ears when she'd reach the top of the arc kept me grinning. Then over again, and mpter some surprisingly agile Spanish, down for some covered oral. Aamie has a wonderful wall mirror that I kept checking out her tidy little bottom in while she went down on me.

Then finally she got on top of me and proved her range of facial expressions is almost limitless. I'm caught between goofy and kooky as a description here. I THINK they were mostly faces of pleasure. Aamie demonstrated the knowledge that sometimes less is more - that sometimes the smallest movements can get a guy off in deeper ways than the big flashy thrusts. mpterwards - very important! - she cuddled, stroked and held me, the come down being almost as good as the going up.

Then we talked and talked while showering and dressing again. Aamie is a very easy person to spend time with - anyone looking for a long booking, Aamie would be an excellent choice. We chatted about this site and various aspects of the industry (including why she kept getting inquiries about the OTHER Aimee). She has an amazingly level headed sense of herself. It then took a while to wrench myself away Reviewom her place - she is a very huggable woman, one I felt very comfortable with.

I'm aware that certain parts of this review might sound very similar to my review of Sarah Haywood - this is not entirely coincidental, as Aamie reminded me of no-one as much as the soon departing Sarah, albeit a redhead version. This is a good thing - a very good thing. Highly recommended. I feel privileged to be writing a review of her.

 

[nonya]

great review

Thanks for the review Nologoboy and yes I will transfer it to her personal profile as well
While on the subject of Miss Aamie, I thought I would mention for those that have noticed the post on AE about her that her photos are indeed real and NO they have NOT been touched up.
NO photos that I take of ladies are touched up or edited apart Reviewom turning them to black and white and or a little bit of light added to them - thats it.
What you see is what you you get :!:

Not to sound dumb or stupid or start any issues here but could someone plzzzzzzzzzzzz give me their thoughts, reason or feedback on something:

Why is it that if a lady advertises on this site questions and queries about her are always asked on another site ?
Like why can't the question be asked here ?
Is it because you think you won't get the truth or you think that people won't see what is written elsewhere or is it something else ??
A serious question because I am stumped and can't for the life of me figure it out

 

[gridagent]

I'm bored in Mackay with nothing to do (see my other post ) so I just had a quick look at the AE site. My first impressions of it were not good, seems like a lot of whingers. The internet allows Revieweedom in so many different ways, some good and some bad. One of those ways is random slagging of other people without the usual checks and balances of normal social interaction.

Nikki I say just ignore it, its not worth worrying about.

 

[Jazmine N]

hey there curious one

Im not like "worried" about it - as it was actually a really serious question as I said - any post is more than welcome for an opinion on this one - but as I said for the life of me I am stumped as to why, what, who and how ......................... 8)

P.S I'll give myself an uppercut if there is no reasonable post on this one - and I know that that will hurt

 

[Chaosman]

In regards to why people post questions / complaints / reviews on other website... The impression (rightly or wrongly) that by posting where the lady is not advertising, you are more likely to get a more honest, unbiased response Reviewom other mp.nets.

I maybe totally off the mark on this, but, my honest impression on posts is as follows....

When posting on a site with the WL's advertising...

* If a positive review is posted, numerous posts/replies appear in support / agreeance
* If a negative review is posted, numerous posts/replies appear attacking the person writing the review

When posting on a site where the WL in question does not advertise...

* If a positive review is posted, some posts/replies appear in a mixture of support / disagreement
* If a negative review is posted, numerous post/replies appear with similar reviews / mild disagreement or even thanks (to the post for giving others the "heads up")

I just feel that there is a "stigma" in regards to:
* Bias, when advertising is involved
* A feeling of not being shot down in flames for negative reviews if no advertising is involved

My thoughts are all muddled up in trying to type this post, so I hope the general gist of what I am saying is coming across...

 

[Stevie mac]

your post

has been noted buttttttttttttt I have had a muddle of a day myself - actually a muddle of a week - god damn it
I do understand what you are saying and I just did a revisit of the AE forum and now it seems that Miss Aamie is the centre of attention .........
Give me a couple of hours to think this one thru then I'll post a reply because like you Blackmax it's in my head but I cant put it into words - damn I hate that ................. 8)

 

[latissimus dorsi]

WTF

Good lord - I posted this review on Saturday. Sent the URL to Aamie - she was having trouble finding the review - on Monday. Over 150 views at that time, no replies. Figured okay, mission accomplished.

Then I see the 'don't visit Aamie' thread on AE. I didn't cut and paste my review there, because - well, it takes time, and I can only visit AE Reviewom a computer at uni, and it's assignment time and the computer rooms are really busy, and I REALLY don't wanna get caught checking out an escort site... but I did say I'd had a good time with Aamie. Oh, and one guy asked if he should still go ahead with his appointment to see her. So I suggested that he SHOULD - but if he didn't, he should have the balls to cancel rather than simply not turn up (which is how I read it).

Now, here's the big question - if this has turned into a hot issue at AE now, could someone PLEASE fill me in on what's being/been posted?

Feel Reviewee to mention this on AE if I've been flamed - and in fact PLEASE do - but because I cannot access the site until MONDAY, I have no way of replying if I'm being flamed, in fact I don't even know if I am or if I'm being paranoid.

I just would hate for certain idiots to think I've been cowed into submission or that I'm too much of a pussy to stand up in a stoosh.

Of course, maybe the debate on AE is civil and well mannered and people are concerned with each others feelings. And maybe Costello will declare the Budget was all one big horrible misunderstanding of a prank that went wrong. So please let me know, huh, guys?

(NLB singing along to Never Mind the Bollocks ATM - 'Anarchy in the UK')

 

[Becky Sue!!]

no babe

you were NOT flamed BUT alas Aamie has just been the HOT topic of conversation.............
It was really just a thread stating that her photos were and I quote this

"In the photos on AB she looks like a honey. Went to see her. The photos are misleading. She is not a honey. I think the photos have been touched up or something"

So my point here was to state that her photos have NOT been touched up nor are they misleading.............
I do try so hard to stay away Reviewom that type of post about our ladies BUT I just can't help myself - I have foot and mouth disease ..........
Especially when they have no way of defending themselves and I think the men that write that CRAP when they know nothing about who, what, why when, should give themselves an uppercut :!:
I'm still concentrating on a reply for the other but my head hurts 8)

 

[narsha84]

BTW

HZholden Im hoping like hell your a member here..............

 

[Pompal 09.]

You are not being flamed

You are not being flamed NoLogoboy, I think he's going to keep his appointment (or so he said). Appreciate your review always and please keep them coming.

As for Vip Nikki, just my two cents, I think the reason why people do more posts in AE may be because the interaction in the forum there is more of "mp.net" to "mp.net" base, eg sharing of different infos between mp.nets; where as in this site its mainly between mp.nets and Wls, and as a mp.net myself, I would be more interested to read reviews or infos on wls, and what other mp.net thinks. You dont see this a lot here. In this forum, you rarely see any discussion about WLs that's not advertising here, I don't want to get into the endless debate on which side should dominate the forum (Wls or mp.net, conflict of interest you see), but for me, I usually go in this site to see if anything new is happening and then spend most of my time reading posts in AE. However, with the way the post has been like lately, sometimes I felt like I am just wasting my time to read some of the posts.

Another thing I want to whinge about, if I may, I really really hates to read the reviews that goes like this: "I saw XXX today, she was great, the sex was good, etc etc, but I don't want to get into the details..blah blah blah... " What's good to the readers without any details? I understand everyone has their right not to post any details, but for me these reviews means much less. Anyway, I started this post thinking I should show some support to NoLogoboy as he has done many good reviews on many sites over the years and has always been very helpful. For that I thank you Nologoboy.

 

[Anton]

On the subject of reviews

Hi everyone,

Perhaps it's just me but I get the impression that there is a perception that we don't allow bad reviews here. I have seen those comments on other sites that say "They only have good reviews there" about AB, so perhaps they just don't bother.

Certainly, as far as the reviews on the ladies' profiles are concerned - we are an advertising medium for the ladies and the good reviews are "showcased" on their profiles. Quite clearly, it would be counter-productive to post negative reviews there.

On the other hand, as far as the forum goes, there are few reviews (good or bad) simply because many people choose not to post them. I can guarantee that we don't delete bad reviews - there are simply none to delete.

No-one has said that you're not allowed to post negative reviews here - you may post anything you like, as long as it isn't crude, abusive or threatening. (and if you do, those WILL be taken down)

Anyway, that's my 22c (inc GST) worth.... :wink:

Cheers,

Raven

 

[Ashley .]

My 2 cents worth

Re the question as to guys who don't post details - apartf rom the obvious one re BBBJs and the law, some wls provide differnet levels of service to different clients dpending on how nice, clean etc they are. This is human nature!

For example, if a lady really has a good time with a guy she might kiss him, but with most of the peple she sees, she probably wouldn't. If guys post details then the next guy who might hav e foul breath and lousy teeth (Reviewom which you could ctontract some std's) will expect kissing too evern though that might be considered TOTALLY unreasonable. Because he will have a bench mark in his mind, set by someone else who was more repectful and had better hygiene and was treated accordingly, he may feel slighted and post saying the service wasn't great. Even tho ladies don't kiss most (or in most cases any) of ther clients. So where a ldy gives a bit extra she usually prefers it to stay private.

Re this site not posting reviews of other ladies - our site does. The ladies, early in the piece, made a joint decision mpter quite a bit of debate that reviews could be posted of ladies who were non payers and left up for 28 days befire being removed. On AE I would point out that the reviews I (and other ladies) recieved WHILE PAYING TO BE ON THE SITE were removed once we left that site. So I'd say we provided more opporunity than AE although perhaps it is not used as much. That's in the client's control rather than the site's control though.

 

[James M]

Where to post a review

It seems to me that this site has more wls in control of content, eg as Raven stated, you will apply your values and censor articles if they do not meet your criteria. Although in 99% of cases I personally might agree with the decisions to delete specific posts not meeting your criteria, and 100% accept your right to do so anyway, it still means that like it or not, AE is therefore where I would post if I wanted to write in blunt, plain and in a totally undiplomatic way. Some guys always write that way: so they are likely to post on AE not here, because they know their post would not survive on here. I see no problem in this setup. To each his own.

In a nutshell: both will accept negative reviews, but AE is where you can write ugly stuff, AB is not.

Hmmm, mpter months of non-wl's I saw Jackie in Surfers yesterday. I wonder where I shall post a review ... if anywhere.

 

[mudfish]

Details

In reply to Carly's excellent post...

Hi babe.

I agree. I am thinking about what details I might post as a review on Jackie, and you are quite right. Due to how I felt on the day, and how she therefore felt, and how she felt anyway, we had a very good time generally, and 'good stuff' happened that probably might not have with other people or at other times. It was not Jackie, its was not me, its was just us and then that made it happen. So I could now review, paid f** all, stayed all day, did the entire suite of possibilities including a new series of activities I had not even dreamt of before (and listed them) (Hmmm, am I exaggerating anyway?), but hey, the next mp.net in is NOT going to get that unless he and she clicks in a similar way.

So, yeah, details are good to a point, but should not be taken as any guarantee the same, or even similar, will happen for other mp.nets.

OK, so while I am on about her, there was good and bad aspects to our meeting, but since I like and respect her open and down to earth and personable approach, I am not sure that I feel inclined to list the bad aspects anyway.

ps For those interested Jackie is not on here. Mobile is 0400 749 075.