baby_gurl_492000 Mary and Chrystal?

[Jennifer S]

They are on Yahoo all the time?

Anyone seen them?

Anyone have a review?

YES - I tried a search...

 

[White House Watching]

There are many. These ladies apparently provide a cheap bb oral release, single or duo (fs as well)

 

[jon_tx888]

There have been plenty of reviews in the "Escort/Incall" area.

They don't generally offer massage; they are noted for providing duo BBBJ.

They evidently are half-sisters; they are not "interactive" with one another - that would presumably be incest.

This isn't really the right forum for this; check the "Escort" areas...

 

[kibastryker]

Presumably this is who UR asking about:

http://babygurls492000.tripod.com/index.html

Search the word "Chrystal" in massageplanet.net and it brings up multiple reviews.

As a sidenote, does anyone else out there add "bonus points" on the looks scale for swallowing?

According to a review I quickly read, Mary's a swallower.

I'd rate her about a 6 in looks plus 2 bonus points for swallowing equals an 8

 

[Rasiklal]

Blow job math is much more relevant to my life than quantum physics!

You are a gentleman IL as I think your 6 is a very generous score.

 

[A.Herd]

I think 6 is about fair. Assuming 5 is dead average. I wonder if they look better in person and with less make up.

 

[ChicoPedro]

I think +2 for BBBJTCIMS is generous.

I think that given the number of BBBJ providers out there that perhaps one should get a 10% increase. And maybe an extra 10% increase for swallowing.

So a score of 6 +0.6 (for BBBJ) + 0.6 (for swallowing) = 7.2

But this adjusted score doesn't even factor in personality, attitude, service, and rates. Obviously strong showings in these other areas may help to boost the score.

Then you also have to provide a special factor with those with a specific fetish that these two ladies provide (e.g. maybe you get turned on by youngish girl next doors with too much make up on).

 

[NikkiBay8]

Now that I think about it perhaps it should be 10% for BBBJ and 5% for CIMS.

So this is how I'm going to crack 2500 posts. Pioneering the field of sexmatics.

I'd like to thank IL for his inspiration..... there that should be a good intro for the Nobel Prize acceptance speech.

 

[MnM]

It certainly makes for an interesting mathematical problem:

Two MPA's want to date you. One is a 10 in looks but average in bed. The other is an 8 in looks but VERY skilled and swallows. Which MPA do you date? Show your math...



Don't stay up TOO late pondering this question my friend. I'm sure the ancient Greeks were debating this thousands of years ago

 

[Philip]

Do you guys really care if they swallow. Sure you might want to bust in thier mouths but who cares what they do with it after. By that time i have rolled over and fell asleep.

 

[Felisha S]

Okay thanks to Pedro's input perhaps the formula should look something like this

Total BJ score (out of 10) = looks (score out of 10) + looks x 10% (for BBBJ)+ looks x 5% (for swallowing) x importance of swallowing factor (a percent)

As for IL's question about the 8 and the 10 well there's not enough into to answer the question.

Here's a basic formula.....

Total Sex score (out of 10) = looks (score out of 10) + looks x 10% (for BBBJ)+ looks x 5% (for swallowing) x importance of swallowing factor (a percent) + 0.05 (for every position beyond missionary, doggie, and cowgirl) + 1 (for greek) + 0.05 (for BLS) + 0.05 (for LFK) + 0.1 (for DFK) + 0.5 (for greek) + 0.05 (for finishing somewhere other than on her chest)+ 0.5 (for personality/attitude)

Now each of these scores must be adjusted using your PPC.

PPC = personal preference coefficient which is a percent representing how important each act is for you.

Therefore, depedning on the PPC each person will have a score that they can use to better reference each review.

Then the score could be modelled against a quadratic function similar to the parabolic arch of a ball flying through the air. This would reflect increases in score with repeated visits which will reach a maximum at a certain point and then possibly diminish after too many visits. Perhaps it could be a formula similar to aspects of compound interest.

 

[Brendan K]

Isn't there software for this??? Maple Mathematica????

 

[Kaia]

A spreadsheet would work well for DIYers and it would allow them the flexibility to change their PPC's as time goes by.

Still in discussion with Maple for a contract. Man I haven't thought about maple in years. USed thier Calculus software back in the day.

 

[Google Help]

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0138704/

I may have to start calling you Max.

 

[beach heaven]

In a moment of seriousness..... you'd be surprised what you can do with math. Man I should have gone into actuarial science. Where math gets really interesting is when you can start factoring in variables that are typically not thought of as numerical such as ethnicity, level of education and so on.

Back to silliness....

But what took you so long GD. My calculations predicted a post by you. I must have forgot to carry the one or take into account the remainder.

The real wackos are the ones who are working on the DSPMPAPT. The dating a SP or MPA probability theorem.

 

[Bond Reeves]

Yeah you are right about that Max. I would umm...cough cough... you know umm... cough cough.........ummm...never work on something like that.

 

[Naguru]

Am I the only one who thinks they look like Eminem groupies

 

[t.n.h]

Yes. They only wish they were Eminem groupies.

He can afford pricier "Hos." (Or at least, he rents such when producing videos...)

 

[Zoo]

anyone know if they interact with each other?