Combine the Forums?

[jillianbarker84]

Does anyone else think it would be easier if the two Escort & MP Forums were combined?

I find that they overlap quite a bit already.

Mainly, we wouldn't have to flip back & forth all the time.

 

[SeanT]

I think it is just fine the way it is..... But that is just me..

 

[Ashlee]

I like it the way it is.
If anything, I'd like to see massage seperated into AMPs and independents.

OTOH, if AMPs and escorts were combined, thaty might make sense, since they both offer FS

 

[Tim O]

I'm with Verb. I think the two forums are quite different. MPs are not independent SPs and SWs. I say nay to merging into one.

 

[Lord of the Flies]

Leave it the way it is. It works fine.

 

[nsw]

status quo is fine for me

 

[Pompal 09.]

Escort and MP are two different services. Way too many threads that need to be in seperate catagories.

Some like the escorts in cal or out, but the MP's are definately a different service and should remain as is.

 

[Nora]

Count me in as a status quo vote.

 

[bluetigerpaw4]

How about two forums, one for full service and the other for full body massage only.
This would be more realistic and save those requiring a massage wasting time searching through the MP postings which now include both distinct types of service.

 

[I Love Funnyjunk.com]

This makes sense.

 

[DC Chillin]

I don't know anyone who goes to a massage parlor for an actual massage. The number of massage only threads is very few, I don't get it.

 

[trichomes]

I agree.. MP for Full Service should be in Escort side.. while massage shouldbe for Massage, HJ, CBJ only .. b/c truly MP for FS is visiting an escort.
Nothin wrong with either hobby .. but would seperate the two for reading purposes...

 

[Meabh]

i say anything to do with escorts (reviews, questions and answers) should be in one catagory and MP's should be in another....right now we have "escorts 411" "vancouver massage" and a pointless hybrid of the two which is "vancouver escorts" .....this last one is redundant....