Peace: you totally misunderstood. I am or was in NO way insinuating that we should do like they did in the past which was lock them up and throw away the key.at
This is why I sought clarification from you. Thanks.
The point I was trying to make is that since as a society we've decided to integrate people with mental illness issues into our society, then there will be times when those mental issues will cause some, or them, harm and this is to be expected. It is also to be expected that, sometimes when they have an episode, force may have to be used.
I understand where you are coming from and of course some measures must be used to defuse a volatile situation. However, as I said previously, with some education on people with disabilities, I am sure the cops would be better equipped dealing with them in case of a delicate situation arises.
Regarding the autistic boy, he was out of control in his own classroom. SO what...let it be....he threw paints....things in the classroom. Big Deal! THey can be replaced. He was alone in the class. No one was hurt. Once he is able to control or calm himself even if it takes him an hour, he can be asked to clean up his mess with or without assistance. Then talk to him about his choices whether they were poor or good. Keep in mind, he is 9 years old. Perhaps the staff involved was inexperienced or got scared or "overrreacted." Usually they should know what to do in case of something like this happens. Then again, I dont know the full story as the media often distorts or fails to provide the full picture.
Ok, so if I understand you correctly, if a cop is assigned to a district that has a school that caters to people with mental health issues, then they should receive 4 yrs of psychiatrist training so IF they get called to the school, they will know how to deal with the problem (like the psychiatrist said in the story). Who is going to foot the bill for that? I sure don't want to.....
I think this is a bit extreme but in this case, I would assume this cop probably took some workshops to familarize himself with the people in his community.
Along those same lines then, I guess you feel that:
If there are chinese living in his district, he should learn to speak chinese?
If there are arabs living in his district, he should learn to speak arabic?
If there are portugese in his district, he should learn to speak portugese?
If there are bikers living in his district he should learn MMA so he can deal with them?
...sorry Tboy, we are going off topic here as my focus was on people with mental issues. However, I would assume that the police force would do its best to hire people that would represent its communities well. This applies to many business organizations as well.
And people wonder why the cops want so much money? Hell with those qualifications he could make $500K a year as a translator......
I am not complaining about their incomes. I know they choose this dangerous occupation but I think putting your life in danger everyday deserves to be well compensated.
Regarding the translator's income..hahaha I want to sign up for it!!!! IN reality, thats not true for many of them. I know some translators charge from anywehre 20-65 dollars an hour. I could be wrong but one of my friends is a freelance translator. She charges 55 dollars an hour for her service.
As for expecting the mother to foot the bill, why is that so unreasonable? I didn't have a kid with mental health issues so why should I be expected to foot the bill for his special needs? While we're at it, should we also foot the bill for customization of a house for someone with a wheelchair? if someone has vision problems should we foot the bill for a 72" flat screen TV? I mean hell, our healthcare system doesn't even cover my dentist visit or my glasses and you're telling me you want me to pay for specially trained police to patrol a special needs school? LOL sorry, there's NO way you could get me on board with that.
People with disabilities deserve to be a part of our society. I dont have children but I pay taxes for them to go to school. Is it fair? No. Yet I strongly encourage that expenses be covered in order for them to have equal access to their able-bodied peers. Unfortunately the problem with our society is that it caters to mostly white able bodied men. For example, Deaf people cant use a public phone because its only for people who can hear. Yet hearing people can use it. In the past, TTC refused to name each bus stop to assist people with vision issues. Yet,they are expected to pay the full price. Or closed captioning wasnt available becuase it was considered expensive and deaf people couldnt watch their shows like their peers. Again they were expected to pay the full cable price. Sure, we can tell them not to watch tv. IS it fair? (and no im not living in a dream world) Funny thing, they now provide these services because many researches have indicated they benefit everyone involved.