Reading this thread (as a former regular contributor who is now only an occasional visitor), I am surprised by the criticism of the sub-forums. Personally I think it is a good idea to have sub-forums on specialist subjects such as โremedial massageโ or โmyofascial releaseโ: it makes it much easier to find relevant discussions.
Although Luke has said โif we wanted a library we would go to oneโ, I think that the therapy forums are in fact quite useful as a library. For example, I see that a couple of old threads on naturist massage and Jing courses were revived recently after laying dormant for some time. I think that it was very sensible for the people who revived those threads to add their comments to an old thread, rather than starting a new one from scratch. And there have been some very useful previous discussions on specialist subjects such as lomi lomi and chavutti thirumal.
Personally I think that the main reason why the therapy forums are much quieter than they used to be is that many people have switched to other โsocial mediaโ sites such as Facebook and Twitter, which werenโt around when I joined HP in 2004.
Alan