Pompal 09.
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2011
- Messages
- 43,916
- Reaction score
- 52
- Points
- 48
I need some opinions...hopefully I posted in the appropriate topic section...
I work in a Day spa. Recently I had a discussion with a fellow therapist prior to a couples massage.
My two questions for all of you are this:
1) Is it appropriate to administer deep tissue massage to a client during a couple's massage when obviously increased communication will be necessary and could disturb the other half of the couple during their massage?
2) When performing deep tissue massage in a spa setting, do you perform only deep tissue spot treatment and then treat the rest of the body with swedish even when it is a full body deep tissue massage?
These questions came up for me during the situation illustrated below.
The therapist had asked me at the front desk when we were returning the Intake forms to the front desk whether i would be performing a deep tissue massage or Swedish. I answered Swedish since it was the first massage ever for the client I would be working on and I feel that it is most appropriate to introduce someone to massage with Swedish not DT. I didn't really question why she was asking me this.
We were about to enter the room to work and she let me know that one of the couple requested deep tissue work. Before I even jumped to whether deep work is appropriate to perform in a group setting where I feel talking should be kept to a minimum...I ran it by her that I was not sure how I would do this if it was ever requested of me since I could not administer a full body deep tissue sequence in just an hour...it would take me an hour and a half. I can only get through the back and upper body or back and legs when performing deep tissue.
We both went to seperate restrooms and when we were about to go in the other therpist than informs me that when deep tissue is performed in a spa setting it should just be the back basically that is deep tissue work and then the rest of the body is worked with Swedish....She let me know that her teachers and mentor at the spa where she worked prior to this told her this because a full body deep tissue would just be too intense and too painful...she said it like it was law, until I challenged her and explained to her what my work is like and that it doesn't cause clients intense pain.
My deep tissue work is myofascialesque and is more about working deeply after the tissue is sufficiently warmed and stretched...anyway...
needless to say this conversation ended abruptly - I let her know that this was an important distinction and that I think we should discuss it further together as well as with the other therapist....
It left me quite off balance when we started working though because of the way it was presented to me with no respect for my work or inquiry.
I just would like some feedback from others especially those who have worked in a spa setting. Seems to me that not administering a full body deep tissue when someone has paid for one may leave a client feeling they did not receive the service they requested.
I work in a Day spa. Recently I had a discussion with a fellow therapist prior to a couples massage.
My two questions for all of you are this:
1) Is it appropriate to administer deep tissue massage to a client during a couple's massage when obviously increased communication will be necessary and could disturb the other half of the couple during their massage?
2) When performing deep tissue massage in a spa setting, do you perform only deep tissue spot treatment and then treat the rest of the body with swedish even when it is a full body deep tissue massage?
These questions came up for me during the situation illustrated below.
The therapist had asked me at the front desk when we were returning the Intake forms to the front desk whether i would be performing a deep tissue massage or Swedish. I answered Swedish since it was the first massage ever for the client I would be working on and I feel that it is most appropriate to introduce someone to massage with Swedish not DT. I didn't really question why she was asking me this.
We were about to enter the room to work and she let me know that one of the couple requested deep tissue work. Before I even jumped to whether deep work is appropriate to perform in a group setting where I feel talking should be kept to a minimum...I ran it by her that I was not sure how I would do this if it was ever requested of me since I could not administer a full body deep tissue sequence in just an hour...it would take me an hour and a half. I can only get through the back and upper body or back and legs when performing deep tissue.
We both went to seperate restrooms and when we were about to go in the other therpist than informs me that when deep tissue is performed in a spa setting it should just be the back basically that is deep tissue work and then the rest of the body is worked with Swedish....She let me know that her teachers and mentor at the spa where she worked prior to this told her this because a full body deep tissue would just be too intense and too painful...she said it like it was law, until I challenged her and explained to her what my work is like and that it doesn't cause clients intense pain.
My deep tissue work is myofascialesque and is more about working deeply after the tissue is sufficiently warmed and stretched...anyway...
needless to say this conversation ended abruptly - I let her know that this was an important distinction and that I think we should discuss it further together as well as with the other therapist....
It left me quite off balance when we started working though because of the way it was presented to me with no respect for my work or inquiry.
I just would like some feedback from others especially those who have worked in a spa setting. Seems to me that not administering a full body deep tissue when someone has paid for one may leave a client feeling they did not receive the service they requested.