Sandy Bullot
Member
- Joined
- Aug 4, 2010
- Messages
- 52
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
Hi all!
I'm studying for ITEC Reflexology (exams in just a couple of weeks ... eek!). I'm pretty comfortable with most of the course but I do have one (pretty big) stumbling block: direct and associated reflexes.
I'm working from Louise Tucker's reflexology text. She lists direct and associated reflexes for various conditions. However she does not offer any explanation for the reflexes listed. This makes it really difficult to learn - I feel like I'm just learning by heart long lists of reflexes, which is both difficult to do and not very constructive.
In some cases the reflexes listed are obvious (more so for the direct reflexes) (e.g. stomach is direct reflex for indigestion). In others a little A&P knowledge can explain the choice of reflex given (e.g. kidneys, eyes, liver, adrenals and pituitary as associated reflexes for diabetes: adrenals, pituitary and liver are all involved in the metabolism of glucose and kidneys and eyes can be damaged by increased blood viscosity that occurs with high blood sugar).
However in many of the cases listed I haven't the slightest idea why the reflexes are chosen, or why one is associated where it seems more obvious as a direct reflex (e.g. lymphatic system as an associated rather than direct reflex for oedema), and in some cases why some obvious (to me anyway!) reflexes have been omitted altogether (e.g. the brain is neither a direct or associated reflex for epilepsy).
So can anyone shed any light on the rationale for Tucker's choice of direct and associated reflexes please? I would be most grateful as I find it much easier to learn when I understand rather than learning by rote.
Thanks folks!
c
I'm studying for ITEC Reflexology (exams in just a couple of weeks ... eek!). I'm pretty comfortable with most of the course but I do have one (pretty big) stumbling block: direct and associated reflexes.
I'm working from Louise Tucker's reflexology text. She lists direct and associated reflexes for various conditions. However she does not offer any explanation for the reflexes listed. This makes it really difficult to learn - I feel like I'm just learning by heart long lists of reflexes, which is both difficult to do and not very constructive.
In some cases the reflexes listed are obvious (more so for the direct reflexes) (e.g. stomach is direct reflex for indigestion). In others a little A&P knowledge can explain the choice of reflex given (e.g. kidneys, eyes, liver, adrenals and pituitary as associated reflexes for diabetes: adrenals, pituitary and liver are all involved in the metabolism of glucose and kidneys and eyes can be damaged by increased blood viscosity that occurs with high blood sugar).
However in many of the cases listed I haven't the slightest idea why the reflexes are chosen, or why one is associated where it seems more obvious as a direct reflex (e.g. lymphatic system as an associated rather than direct reflex for oedema), and in some cases why some obvious (to me anyway!) reflexes have been omitted altogether (e.g. the brain is neither a direct or associated reflex for epilepsy).
So can anyone shed any light on the rationale for Tucker's choice of direct and associated reflexes please? I would be most grateful as I find it much easier to learn when I understand rather than learning by rote.
Thanks folks!
c