Jen, I understand your position, I think Bodyworkers does too, if you read your last line, if she doesn't mindme mentioning it.But this is about KIDSWhat pleased me was the idea of the classroom assignment. This teacher is interested in giving her kids the opportunity to be a part of the system. Don't you think they'll be excited, and do the best job they can? She's teaching them how to use their talent and interest to contribute to the world around them, and become self sufficient. I can guess your next comment, "Well, she should be teaching them about copyrights, too."If so, my response to that is "Not at this level."Copyrights is an important issue, I don't mean to make light of it. I'm a designer as well, and I know why you weren't able to get a copyright. Number 1: you didn't design the cradle. Number 2: you didn't design the concept of the cover. This is owned by the original designer. Number 3: your original design was not different enough by perceneforum.xxxe to the design created by the copyright owner.Copyrights have become an inflamed issue, mainly because of the Internet. I see it in every forum, whether it be beading...crocheting!...quilting...Now Grannie is afraid to sell her doilies at the church bazaar!I found one forum where they argued that it was illegal to quote, because even if you note the original speaker you are incorporating another's thoughts with yours.Its ridiculous! As Shakespeare said, "There is nothing new under the sun." From the beginning of time, we've been taking things apart and remaking them. This is an age so stifling of creativity! If this frenzy really took hold, there would be no innovation or improvements.My God! Every person around the world, sitting reading this is wearing somebody's knock off of an original design. Unless you are ultra rich!You know, *lol*... please don't be offended, but I've honestly noticed the loudest complainers are actually people who have adapted original ideas, as you have (see Number 1 and 2 especially), to make a new product? *lol*..."Give the kids a break!"I doubt Jenny means to become a "global headrest cover baron". I'm glad she gave them an opportunity. Hopefully the garbage, and the cloudy mess that copyright issues have become, will be sorted out with intelligence, and good spirit, so that at least children can be allowed to learn without fearing a lawsuit.If massage strokes were copyrighted as a property, goodness! No one would be allowed to massage!! I see the infection going there as well. I learned a lot of new work by friends sharing their favorite strokes. I shared some of my own when I gave a massage and someone thought, "I like how that feels, I'm going to do that too." Should we start fearing technique thieves every time we massage? Will we have to use spies and lawyers to keep that "property" our own? Will we one day have to fear every new client because it might be a spy? Will bodyworkers have to give a cut from every massage to the original "inventors" of the technique? Can you see where this can go?And who respects and protects the original inventors of massage? Most styles and approaches are "a little of this and a little of that"... adapted from ancient origins. And those bones are conveniently dried to dust. Just my two cents!gi