Lexy @ Pickering Angels

[ladydi]

Yesterday I had a pleasure with Lexy (new addition to PA).
For those of you not in the know, at PA there are predominantly Caucasian women, if not exclusively. The few times I have been there I have always been impressed with the quality of the service. When I first met Lexy I was so impressed with her pretty face that I decided to go off the board and take one hour NR session (4 pink-s).
Lexy has EE background with perfect English, stands 5'8", weighs 140, 34c would be my best guess. Her titties are "real deal" and they are nice and firm. Like I said she has a beautiful face, full lips, straight teeth, nice complexion, straight long blonde hair.
This session was memorable. Not only did she give a good massage, but also she is very pretty, charming and friendly. The NR was amazing, and I never had any sense that she was watching the clock. All in all, a fabulous experience.
You may check her schedule at http://www.pickeringangels.com/schedule.htm

 

[madart]

shill

 

[AliL]

I'm tired of the overuse of the word "shill". Although I haven't seen this new angel yet, I have had numerous sessions with two other ladies and always had a great time. Share your reasons why you think this is a shill. Just because he's a newbie and can spell properly? Or because he can actually write a professional review?

 

[Chutch]

calloway, I do agree the word SHILL has become somewhat of an insult here at massageplanet.net and it could be discouraging to put up further reviews when you hear this, but sometimes it's just a joke and could be funny.

It could also be because since he registered in 2003, he has had only 3 reviews. Two of which are identical and in different sections and one of another lady at PA.

I have to admit that I questioned his motives as well when I read this thread. We need to give him time to put up more reviews from a variety of MPs, unless he has only gone hobbying only twice in the last year and only to PA. If so, I offer my appologies.

If the ladies are good at PA, there will be other reviews to verify this.

 

[irenaaneri1980]

The ladies at PA are good.

 

[<3 molly b]

I have not been back since Sophie left any idea what happened to her?

 

[Pompal 09.]

The review and description seem accurate to me. There are a few errors, but then Marcus doesn't know Lexy as well as I do. ;-)

 

[Jalal]

Dear Bruce, I am sorry you feel that way - if only I could convince you I have no affiliation with any MP that would make my day, but ... you are the so called "Senior member"... so I figure you know better, eh?!
I carefully checked the review board and there are other high caliber members that feel the same way about the MPA I described, so are they also called shill-s???
Please look up the following link:

http://www.massageplanet.net.ca/vbulletin/showthread.php?s=&threadid=52857&highlight=lexy

 

[Kanchan]

Marcus66

Don't take too much on an offense at the dude. I'm sure there are cases of self promotion on massageplanet.net. A false review can cost some of us $.

With only 3 posts all regarding the same MP, you should expect this kind of response. It's nothing personal.

I don't see the Shiek backing anyone that often and to see it here means your review is valid. You've won. Lets leave it at that.

 

[mizfurrocious]

theycallmebruce & buckybruce are two different people...

Marcus, I think your review of Lexy was fair and evenhanded(hey, I even agree with Mr K., go figure) even though I have never seen her. The only reason I could see that someone would think you're a 'shill" is your link to her schedule....since she doesn't have a picture up yet on the site, it "could" look like someone is "trolling" for new business. We're all big boys here and could look it up ourselves, if so inclined.

But thanks, and keep hobbying and post some more reviews about other spas in Durham.

 

[Shanshannon]

not everyone that indulges in Adult Entertainment is on massageplanet.net Brucey.....so just because he has not posted before does not mean he is new to the scene......."think before type" ...booooo to yoooouuuuu!

 

[Pompal 09.]

Yikes, I had the same thought about the link to the schedule when I read the review, but since I knew Lexy, I knew the review wasn't a shill.

BTW bucky, I did intentionally 'bait' you the other day and unfortunately forgot to clue Kiarra in first. Just fuckin' with ya man! Happy hobbying.

K

 

[The physician]

Sheeeesshhhh......what a rotweiller....I assume they(the mods) deleted her response to my final post with "extreme" prejudice...I can only imagine...

 

[e l i z a ?]

Rotweiller???? Really??? ME???

What other insults can you fly my way this week, Bruce?

Also, did you ever think that maybe the posts where deleted for the things you said, not me???? Could be possible, how are we to know unless a Mod confirms the reason for the deleted posts. There were about 3 or more posts before mine that were deleted as well.

Kiarra

 

[look is linda]

yikes......

 

[See]

Kiarra....when I likened you to a "rotweiller", what I mean't is that you're tenacious....like an attack dog...once you get your "teeth" into something you just won't let go...regardless of the fact you're in over your head here...you "diss" me crudely, while I "diss" you with class and wit...being tenacious is not an insult, when applied to a worthwhile purpose.

Since I never saw your last responding post, the logical assumption is you went "postal"...why don't you ask the "mods" why our posts were deleted...I think they deleted them because they really served no useful purpose, and did nothing to further the real purpose of the board...

Nag, nag, nag.....jeez....Ashton, please PM with your 2 cents worth, if it can't be posted on the main board...I'm hoping the smiley face is a positive indicator...

 

[Happy Hunter]

just saw Vanessa at PA and i have to say i was not impressed. she was good looking and has a tight body but everything was so.....distant ..... she seemed to be elswhere and though she did not seem to be a clock watcher the session was ended just under the 1/2 hour. Being a long standing studio B supporter i will have to saw that not all the ladies have the body Vanessa has but with the rare exception the quality of service is much higher and restrictions fewer. Is it the establishment or the ladies that set the restrictions out there and if it is the ladies are there any ladies that are less restrictive and more responsive. after a regular dose of Victoria and Kim i may be hard to please but they at least have to try.

 

[Bella&BO]

Flyingdgn, I disagree. Marcus66 posted a review that is only being questioned because of his level of experience and the range of MP's he's posted about. He shouldn't EXPECT to be, in effect, be called a liar (shill). There are many of us that have a favorite MP, so of course all of our reviews are about their MPA's. If we click with a specific MPA we may not venture to anyone else and therefore not post reviews for anyone else. Some of us don't hobby as often. But the way I interpret your comments all of these would be red flags for a shill review. The end result is newbies get insulted and don't come back (just a guess on my part).

 

[Breck]

MJ.

My appologies for my poor choice of words. He shouln't EXPECT, but be more understanding of why people say shill.

I don't like it either when someone says 'shill', but it is funny sometimes. Take is as massageplanet.net humor and not someone calling you a liar.

There are nastier responses on massageplanet.net than someone suspecting self promotion like people picking on spelling, grammer or choice or words, name calling, overly nasty reviews or unnecessary negative comments.

I hope I was clear in my statement of Marcus' Validity.

Marcus66, don't get discouraged about writing reviews, even if it's about another PA MPA. I look forward to reading future reviews from you.

As newbies go, I haven't been on massageplanet.net very long myself and consider myself a newbie as well. I try to contribute to massageplanet.net as much as possible and try to be nice as possible, but I make mistakes as well so thank you for the correction.

Now, lets let this thread die. The review has been written, Shiek backs PA, and I'm starting to feel bad about my poor choice of words.

 

[Tina]

Its a valid review and not a shill.