MP Cameras

[Everard G]

I went to an MP about a month or so ago and I noticed one (or was it two?) camera in the reception area.
Is it standard practice to have cameras in MP's and do they have cameras in the private rooms as well?

 

[skeptik]

Cameras are in the reception area to record people coming and going for security, they also are used to monitor the cash flow. There are no cams in the rooms though.

 

[dlyle76]

"There are no cams in the rooms though."

Oh really? How about behind the mirrors?

 

[greendaylover7]

Nor behind the mirrors either

 

[McGregor]

There may be no cameras but often the peep hole in the door is set up to look in not out .If you dont beleive me try it for yourself.

 

[~.:Just Me:.~]

Hidden cameras in the rooms, or peepholes in the doors, would be noticed by inspectors. The owner would likely be fined, and be at risk of loosing their municipal licence.
As far as i know, all spas have cams in the reception area for secuirty, and to count customers.

 

[MyLILJohhny]

I maybe wrong here - and I am sure people will pounce if I am - but I was under the impression that some municipalties REQUIRE peepholes in the doors.

 

[leos_mama]

All municipalities require peepholes and that was how cops eyewitnessed underaged MP's having sexual intercourse with customers.

 

[spz1827]

Thanks for your unbiased contributions to the message forum once again Wendel.

Let's see. Peepholes are not just to find violations, but you make sure to bring in the udneraged element into your post.. becuase we not that only happens at MP's right?

Your ten or so posts on the massage board consist of:
1. Saying you get FS all the time at the MP, in a thread you tried to stir some shit in (yet you say you don't go to MP's in another thread)
2. Constantly bringing up threads on robberies.
3. Commenting on how SC's are better values then MP's.
4. Bringing up the criminal element at MP's.

No agenda at all.

 

[Anna C]

Note to self stick a wad of TP in the peephole.

 

[Rush]

Ya really! And hang the obligatory housecoat in front of the peep hole..and turn the lights off!

This is sounding too much like being at home!

 

[Ace271]

OH man, I have been away from the board for a while. But it never fails to amaze me how the cam in the rooms issue resurfaces from time to time. Smile, you're on the newest rub and tug site! Just kidding. The cams are in the hallways and at the entrance for security reasons.

 

[Pompal 09.]

I work in the security industry, Does anyone else know how small cameras are these days? other then me?! If you don't know what to look for, then there might be a covert camera in there...... I always look, but that's due to my trade, and the fact that I can't be on camera...........

Arghy

 

[LRonCupboard]

Cameras for MP's security is alright at their reception area and outer longes
but there should be Zero Tolerance for having Cameras in the Massage Rooms, definitely cleints would not tolerate any cameras in Massage Rooms.
observe ZERO TOLERANCE For such acts if any MP's are doing so, they should be avoided at all cost.

 

[Babby22]

I like being watched,

I'd also buy a copy of the tape if I am being filmed.

 

[__A_YAHOO_USER__]

Getting sensitive, eh?

 

[Khushbakht]

I just can't imagine any reputable MP or for the matter some that are not so reputable putting cameras in the rooms. What is the point in doing it? There is no upside here only downside. If they want to stay in business, and we can only suspect they do. No business owner in his or her right mind would take such a risk. They are first and foremost want to stay in business.

As Sheik has mentioned in a previous post, the camera's in the studios generally are located at enterances of the place for security and for "keeping the ladies honest". That is the only reason, why cameras are used. As for peep holes, some places have them and some don't, bylaw says the studios must have them, but if the place is generally acknowledged by bylaw officers as "clean operations" do not push the issue if they don't have peepholes. These are generalizations, however I hope it helps.

 

[Greshnab]

Why would a place want to have cameras to document things (extras) that perhaps shouldn't be happening? Doesn't sound like a smart move. Why remove plausible deniability?

 

[sun8979]

but aren't SPA's prohibited by law?

 

[rocknrolltrekkie]

Couldn't agree more.

CC