MPAs review : Jen & Jen

[J. K]

MPAs review : Jen & Jen

Had a session with Jennifer@HFH few days back, she was very pretty and extremely friendy. I am not going to get into details as you will not be disappointed ( of course within limit ). Highly recommended but please don't take my word as I don't want to see her too busy so that it's hard for me to make an appointment with her.

Look 9/10
Body 8/10
attitude 10/10
massage : to bad she didn't give me one

Also, had a session with Jenna@IT earlier this evening, think she was overrated or she wasn't in the mood (no excuse ), I was very polite the whole time. First of all, her massage sucks, no conversation and when it was her turn on the table. she turned me off because her legs wasn't shaved or growing too fast since the morning, as well she closed her legs like I was going to put my head inside her. So I tried to relax her by caressing the area around and it worked a bit. However, she immediately asked me if I wanted to go on the table just 5 minutes after she was on it. I said no problem as I feel she just wanted to finish ASAP. I feel the same way too. I guess she figure out I wasn't happy about her attitude and she said normally she is like that with customer she's seeing the first time but things will get better ( no way I will repeat with her ). From the time she entered the room to finish was about 22 minutes. You will like her look if you like porn star look alike. However, I didn't find her beautiful.

Look 7/10
Body 8/10 man made but was well done
attitude 5/10
massage 4/10

 

[Adam D]

"Wastn't in the mood (no excuse)" - This occurs far more often than you think, even back in her HFH days. I can easily work out similar contrasts between her and Angela, Amber etc of IT.

 

[barhopper]

Good reviews Ticaman.

 

[Bccn]

Go figure. Although I have only seen her once at IT (as opposed to numerous times at BP and HFH), I have never had a bad experience.

 

[=0) Exotic Motorcyclist]

Bad experience, you only need it once.

 

[Yep]

Also, they may have entered into a steady relationship with an SO that they somehow try to be "faithful" to. That is, the SO may want her to withhold extras she used to do freely when she was younger, wilder, and unattached. So if the SO says, "No daty, no dfk, no ***j's, etc.", the mpa tries her best to avoid offering these which causes some awkward and tense moments with regulars who are used to having the high mileage. So the mpa feels caught between satisfying her regular clients and being true to her SO. This is how the mpa starts losing her regulars and reduces a significant number of repeat business. Note that some mpa's may tell their SO to take it or leave it, especially as the relationship gets stale or after they have big fights...I guess it depends if the mpa is in the early stages of the relationship with the SO and how in love the mpa is with the SO. If she is head over heals in love, then she doesn't care if she is not as busy as before and her sessions do not take too much out of her sex drive...saving it for the SO...the lucky guy. For those who are regulars with certain mpa's, you'll know what I mean about the above observation.

 

[confusedcannary]

DFK has put together a very interesting theory which has some merit in general. However, if you read Ticaman's post a bit more closely as highlighted above, you'll realize that having a SO does not explain why he left the MP an unhappy client. Rather, bad attitude and poor customer service (mood control in this case) are better explanations. May be poorer business (some thing she has problem adjusting to) really gets to her - so it is a viscious cycle.

Having a bad hair day (no pun intended) didn't help either.

Her explanation of future repeat visits work better than first visit cited by Ticaman is......(sigh).........no comments.

For a fact, she had a history of pissing people off even during her "glory" days at HFH.

There are many better alternatives at IT.

As much as I like DFK's theory, I think her people skill might have been put to the real test. If this is the case, I would not want to be her SO.

The same may apply to the other mpa DFK hinted at.

Having said all these, I am open to the possibility that my interpretation is completely off.

 

[magix151]

of what dfk said...

a mpa with regulars will not try to drum up new clients...and may purposely give lacklustre sessions to new clients...I think as a mpa they will see a client but if they have enough regulars to care less about anyone else...those new clients won't get the best session possible...

I've only seen Jenna once...and that's good enough for me...but I can agree on some aspects of the initial review...