Said with Precision. As far as the Libertarians go, they like you said are definitely in favor of legalization but highly unlikely to take any responsibility when it comes to handling abuse and/or unregulated markets. The typical liberal view is that government expenditure on interdiction should be scaled back or eliminated, with these funds transferred to
the budget for drug-abuse treatment. The libertarian view is that interdicting drugs and subsidizing treatment are, at a minimum, separate issues. Governments can scale back interdiction without necessarily increasing treatment budgets, and the question of whether to subsidize treatment arises with or without legalization. In addition, libertarians doubt that expenditure for drug-abuse treatment is a good expenditure of government funds. This perspective again derives from the view that most
individuals make informed, voluntary decisions to use drugs and that reducing drug use is not an appropriate goal for government policy. Hope this helps!
the budget for drug-abuse treatment. The libertarian view is that interdicting drugs and subsidizing treatment are, at a minimum, separate issues. Governments can scale back interdiction without necessarily increasing treatment budgets, and the question of whether to subsidize treatment arises with or without legalization. In addition, libertarians doubt that expenditure for drug-abuse treatment is a good expenditure of government funds. This perspective again derives from the view that most
individuals make informed, voluntary decisions to use drugs and that reducing drug use is not an appropriate goal for government policy. Hope this helps!