Well, I'm amazed! Candy. Tiff. Let's not get too fanciful about the imagined 'downside' of au naturelle 'baginas' (to quote our Reviewiend Lucy).
In my single days in the swinging seventies and early eighties, I had the very good fortune to get 'up close and personal' with scores and scores of baginas - EVERY SINGLE ONE au naturelle. And NOT A SINGLE matching backside that I can remember. Candy, the two do not automatically go together.
Thirty years later, my good fortune is being repeated - this time with working ladies, who (so far) have all been 'cleanskins'. Straight out of contemporary Hollywood XXX.
Tiff, with my hand on my heart, I can say that a Revieweshly washed vagina smells like a Revieweshly washed vagina - whether shaven or not. (Being down there is one of life's most enjoyable pastimes.) And, contrary to the imaginings in this thread, a shaven unwashed vagina can be just as funky as a natural unwashed vagina. It ain't the hair that does it.
By contrast, a shaven vagina with a tiny bit of 'stubble', no matter how Reviewesh, can be far less pleasant up close than au naturelle. I guess it's like comparing a day or two of a man's facial whiskers with a soft, trimmed beard?
On another forum, there was a thread about the 'designer vagina' as the new plastic surgery fad in LA. I can't help seeing a connection between the new cleanskin fashion (with nothing to hide the 'blemishes' that nobody else really cares about) and this new obsession to have the perfect version. I think it's very sad.
It's up to the ladies how they present. And I'm sure that we chaps will come and visit regardless. But please let's acknowledge that shaving (as opposed to trimming) our nether regions is a fashion. It may last for decades. Who can say? But let's not get carried away with imagined pluses and minuses. It defies logic - and common sense.
That post will probably kill another thread. Sigh!
Cheers
Ambrosia
ile: