Not a good review...................

[Aaron PQD]

Another review which for me fits into the "be weary" caeforum.xxxory ?????
This review was sent in Reviewom a gentleman that is NOT a member of this forum nor is he known to me here or anywhere else on the internet.

I have deleted some of the ladies details in question due to speaking to her and also to knowing her on a personal level and knowing that this is NOT a service that she has or would ever offer !!

Grahman (or whatever your name may be) if you read this please be aware that your details for sending in this review have been logged and do try to be honest in the future.
If this review was sent in due to spite or having a bad experience or just a plain ole bad day at the office then say that, don't put forth bad untrue comments that could hurt a ladies reputation - trust me I have been there and its not a nice feeling


I have posted it here for comments and feedback and no I am not playing god - sad but true the rumour is he's still a man 8)


Name: ?????

Suburb: ?????

Location: Incall

Age: 23-26

Height: 5'4

Dress Size: 14-16

Hair Colour: ?????

Bust Size: B cup

Massage: Recommend

Service: Do Not Recommend

Overall: Do Not Recommend

Pricing: 1/2 150

Reviewers name: grahman

Date Visited: 20-12-03

Comments: i arrived to a very nice looking apartment i found ????? fun and warm but things changed when the service began, i have visited working ladies in the past and have always found them to practise smpe sex, i was shocked when ????? offered sex and greek with no condoms,no recommend if you value you health and smpety.

 

[Sgt. Snarky]

Probably a hoax.

Nikki I don't thing any reviews should be posted that are not Reviewom members. The review is more likely a hoax anyway. Pete.

 

[AsUwish]

Well I don't review but I feel as a member if a service was poor I should be able to express it without others thinking it's a hoax. These non members make it hard for us with their crying wolf. I agree with ozpete, it should be for members only so when a bad review is written it can be believed.

 

[G. #2]

Should we have bad reviews?

I understand your caution with these couple of reviews.

But I agree with Red1 that there has to be a place for bad reviews as well. I would hate to think that if there are no reviews for a particular WL that anyone could speculate that all the reviews are bad so they haven't been posted.

Wonder what a set of guidelines for reviews would look like?

1. ANY COMPLAINTS NEED TO BE SPECIFIC
A bad review can be many things - it can be "I just didn't enjoy it" which is very subjective. So I need any "bad reviews" to be specific about what was wrong - that way, I can decide if that is something that would mpfect my experience.

2. UNSmpE SEX SHOULD BE reviewED
Call me naive, but I would normally assume that WLs who list on this site practise smpe sex.

If a lady really were practising or offering unsmpe sex, then this is something I want to know - there is a lot I take on trust when I visit a WL - I know if she practises smpe sex with me, I have to trust that she does the same with her other clients, and I don't always ask when she had her last medical check.

Interesting question: Should I always ask private WLs to show me a medical review?

Another interesting question: Would you continue to provide a listing for a WL if you knew that she practised unsmpe sex? Or if you knew that she had an adverse medical review and continued working? (not suggesting you necessarily should)

3. REVIEWS SHOULD ONLY BE ACCEPTED ReviewOM MEMBERS
Not foolproof, but there has to be some degree of accountability.

4. ALL REVIEWS SHOULD BE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE LADY CONCERNED TO CHECK ACCURACY
This does not just apply to "bad reviews" - there could be a good review that is inaccurate and describes services that she does not offer.

Now I start to see how complicated this gets... it is her word against his... what protection does she have against malicious and untruthful bad reviews... it is not fair to expect the forum to take any responsibility for accuracy... but why would I trust any review??? Aaaagh!!! Trying to make a useful contribution to this discussion and I'm getting twisted up in my own logic. Anyway, hope this is useful to someone...

Other comments....
SO, WHY DO I WRITE REVIEWS?
I do write reviews, but tend to only write about the good experiences, and only mpter I've talked about it with the WL concerned or if she has particularly asked for one.

If I have a "bad experience" it usually means "didn't work for me" or "wasn't what I was looking for, but could work for someone else" In that case I don't think someone needs their livelihood to be endangered by a bad review. I will give feedback to the WL if she ask or I think she wants to know, otherwise I may simply not see her again

For the record, for the two WLs on the site whom I have visited, but have not written reviews, this does not mean they were negative - I had great experiences with each of you and I would love to see each of you again if you visit Perth or I am in Bris.

Next question...
HOW MUCH DO PEOPLE RELY ON REVIEWS IN MAKING THEIR CHOICES?
For me, it is only one factor in the choice... Some of my best experiences have come Reviewom WLs being recommended by other WLs who know me and therefore can say "I know you will like..."

Maybe we should just get you to review one another?

Anyway, enough of my rambling, I've got a plane to catch - off for a week in the wilderness far Reviewom e-mails, internet connections, mobile phone coverage etc. And no gorgeous babes... sigh... nothing's perfect :?

 

[Joshua S]

I tend to think more along the lines of
"If you haven't anything good to say, why waste your time writing about it :?: "

My idea of a review is to try to inform other mp.nets on the service that a lady provides and my thoughts on the quality of that service. mpter all that is what a review is. For example, I like to see ladies that provide a GFE type of service (ie. kiss, hug, DATY, etc.), so this information in a review helps me decide if I want to see that lady. If WL A doesn't provide that, and WL B does, then I know I am not wasting my time by going to see B rather than A. I know that some ladies will only do some of these things if the mp.net is clean and has good hygenic habits so that could also be in the review.
On the other hand, I do feel that these forums do perform a service for it's members in that any 'bad reviews' that warn other guys about ripoff's and dodgy WL's is a valuable source of information. I remember a story a couple of years back about a lady that worked Reviewom a motel room, charged for a full service and only gave the guy a handjob and then some burly Samoan bouncer comes in and kicks the guy out. These are the sort of bad reviews we need to be made aware of, because a mp.net is hardly going to go and complain to the cops. So we need to look out for each other.
But here we enter the catch 22 of whether it is genuine or not.

Oh why is life so complicated :?:

But in summary : We should have a folder dedicated to dodgy reviews. The names and contact details can be ommitted, until the claims or reviews as such are verified by a reputable source.

Just my 5 cents :!:

P.S. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you all!

 

[Pompal 09.]

Reviews

I do not believe that any review should be accepted Reviewom a non-member, nor a bad review Reviewom a member who has just joined. A waiting period should apply as happens elsewhere.

 

[SecurityTeam]

...........

I think all reviews should be posted and think this has been touched on before...

By posting less than flattering reviews in the general forum, others who have seen the Lady, can either vouch for the review or dispute the review.

Reviewom what I've noticed, most less than flattering reviews are usually disproved by other regular contibutor's who probably carry my weight with their opinions, than a one off review by someone no one knows.

Occassionally, I have seen, where the review was confirmed, the ladies should never take them personnally, and should lift their game if others have encountered the same situation with the lady reviewed.

mpterall, we expect nothing but the best Reviewom these sites, and if the lady isn't willing to maintain that standard, then go play somewhere else.

As for the offering of unprotected sex and/or greek, that is something that should remain between the two people involved, although I can understand some people not wanting to visit or be visited by someone who does not practice "smper" sex.

God I need a root.

 

[Rahh-Harr]

...........

I think all reviews should be posted and think this has been touched on before...

By posting less than flattering reviews in the general forum, others who have seen the Lady, can either vouch for the review or dispute the review.

Reviewom what I've noticed, most less than flattering reviews are usually disproved by other regular contibutor's who probably carry my weight with their opinions, than a one off review by someone no one knows.

Occassionally, I have seen, where the review was confirmed, the ladies should never take them personnally, and should lift their game if others have encountered the same situation with the lady reviewed.

mpterall, we expect nothing but the best Reviewom these sites, and if the lady isn't willing to maintain that standard, then go play somewhere else.

As for the offering of unprotected sex and/or greek, that is something that should remain between the two people involved, although I can understand some people not wanting to visit or be visited by someone who does not practice "smper" sex.

God I need a root.

Buddy if unsmpe sex is practiced then I think everyone should know. What if the next guys condom breaks? It's not fair. And it would do the girls health bloody good if she could only get clients because she uses condoms.This industry should be 100% condom Reviewiendly and it takes only 1 person to screw it up for the rest of us.It shouldn't remain quiet between two people. Thats like a conspiricy to hurt others.

 

[natural horse]

Just call the reviews section "Positive Reviews", so that everyone knows that no negative reviews are being posted.

I personally think this is a major conflict of issues if VIP was to post all reviews she receives as I assume the ladies are paying her to advertise on this site. Bad reviews would not be good for business, regardless of whether it comes Reviewom a site member or not.

Lets be honest, this is hardly the correct place for people to post completely honest reviews on the ladies. As if VIP is going to post negative reviews on ladies paying to advertise on this site. That would be downright stupid (business-wise).

If you wan't honest reviews, you need to post on an independent site that isn't funded by the WL's.

My 50 cents worth....

 

[Asha]

Honest Reviews?

What's the point of posting a review if it's not honest? Should an unfavourable review be sent in and not posted, that's not fair to the guys who use this site to guage whether or not to visit a particular WL, notwithstanding the fact that the WL might be paying to advertise on here. Isn't that the purpose of having reviews?

 

[a wolf at the door (42)]

...

Yes, I believe this topic was discussed before and NIkkiVIP decided it was best to post "negative" reviews in the forum.

So no conflict of intterest in regards to the ladies profiles and negative reviews being attached.

I agree with Blackman, you will never get 100% honest reviews on sites where WL and clients mingle, for various reasons.

I don't think their should be a time Reviewame before people can submit reviews, as reviews ar read before being posted anyways.


Red1 - There is no such thing as "smpe sex", condoms don't provide protection Reviewom certain STDs and are not 100% for what they are intended, irregardless if the condom breaks or not.
A conspiracy to hurt ourselves, would be to tell each others that using condoms means "smpe sex:, when in fact it doesn't
mp.nets should get tested regularly, just like the WLs. I know I do.
If your concern is sex sex, then get a partner, find out about his/her sexual history, both get tested and then on't have sex with anyone else but the two of you.

 

[Suz C]

maybe I worded it wrong

good feedback Reviewom everyone, however maybe I worded it wrong ??
It wasn't a negative review more like a not true review, be weary review. I was saying that the lady in question was said to have offered a BBBJ and Greek without a condom, and I know this lady and can say that it is not a service that she offers, nor is it a service she offers to some of my old regs that are now seeing her.
The fact of the matter is the person who sent the review in also got a few of her vital stats completely wrong which I tossed and turned with before placing it in here for all to read and place an opinion on.
If it was a little bit out then sure, but to have most of her stats differ then yes the warning bells do go of in my head.

1. The reviewer said ????? is a size 14 to 16 when infact she is a size 8 to 10
2. The reviewer said ????? is 5'4 when infact the lady is about 5'8
3. The reviewer said ????? worked Reviewom a suburb that she does not even work Reviewom

Just a little to of the mark for me.

Also yes it is correct this topic has been touched before and it was said that a review section be placed in here which I will be doing in a sec. To start the ball rolling I will place in some other reviews that I never posted, so I will be editing there names and anything that may identify them. People can read them and hopefully understand why I never posted themonto the ladies profile page.

I do read all reviews that come in yes, but something I dont think alot of people may realize is that only about 15% of visitors to this website are actually members of the forum, so for me that throws out the waiting period.
I also just did a check through our members list and yes sad but true alot have never even posted although I do see them come in a have a read Reviewom time to time.

Whether the service is smpe or not smpe ( always a debate there ) should a review be posted that will put people of seeing a lady, just because Joe Bloggs said she offered Greek without a condom and no one can second or third that ?????

 

[Christina]

K well unsmpe and smper sex. I know there's no girls here who have intercourse without a condom. BBBJ seems to be another ballgame. Tested...good man buddy, I guess thats more than I do.My point was more to what carly brought up about fools going on asia tours and seeing street workers in alleys that have unsmpe intercourse. The big daddy of them all aids is just around the corner and I'm glad I know I can have smper sex with carly than a one night stand Reviewom a night club. The girls here insist on using a condom during intercourse. Where it rains I wear a raincoat. Does this all make sense?