Professionalism or passion ?

[:))]

I am looking for GFE like most hobbyist s who post here.
I am wondering whether one gets more out of a session with a somewhat older (and perhaps less physically blessed), more seasoned MPA who may perform her task with passion as opposed to some younger, popular stars (or even superstars) who have the talents and the physique to do everything right to "please" but deep down they are less into it.
Like to hear from others.

 

[msmonroe2003]

It's hard to generalise and depends what your definition of GFE is, but I think the longer they are in it then the more distant or detached they can become.

It's also possible that the longer they are in it then the more comfortable they become and are able to connect better.

Some of the younger mpa's actually will put more of themselves into it, resulting in a passionate experience.

I'd say it's possible to get a balance of both the things you are looking for in the better MPA's.

what was the question ?

 

[Rouge Kiss Angel Tattoo]

I am referring to how the MPAs participate in the session and how much they enjoy the interaction (I usually go for at least NR) that makes it one of the most important ingredients of a GFE.

I would appreciate suggestions for young and well endowed MPAs who are very into the sessions.

 

[Babe]

Happy's right

The average age range of IT/HFH girls I think is 20 to 27 ( max ? ) so "older" is pretty relative. SB possibly a younger bracket.

 

[Jock]

That's a pretty tough call.

Girls that "really" offer a GFE are likely to not be
terribly consistent in that, because it'll vary from visit
to visit and guest to guest based on how they feel and react.

On the other hand, the "distant-eyed pro" is hardly going to
be attractive.

The preferable "in between" strikes me as being the "pro"
that knows what the guests want to buy, which is an
experience where they try to feign intimacy. I
care not if it's totally real. In fact, if they
think it's "real," that's probably bad. Fake interest well
and that probably is best for everyone.

 

[nearlyfond]

Thanks for all the above insightful comments and suggestions:

Should let you know that I have had a few memorable exceptions at the above mentioned establishments:

(List by no means complete, just examples)

Jaydian of Studio B - very genuine reaction to our interactions - 3-4 visits before her retirement

Rebecca of Iletmos - many visits but her quick rise to stardom made her very inaccesible relatively quickly

Kelly of IT - gorgeous, very attentive, bordering between professional/very good and very into it

Yana of Studio B - 1 encounter only, very impressed, couldn't tell if we clicked or not

Examples of professional performances (very good) from very popular young stars:

Melanie of Studio B (retired)
Alexis of IT
..........

The search goes on.

 

["Tree"]

Re: Professionalism or passion ?

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by hobby man

Personally, I think MPAs such as Alexis (IT), Amber (IT) are knock-outs and great eye candy but the 'feeling' or 'passion' in the session is missing or just way to artificial.

Although Tarah & Savannah (HFH) are either darn good actresses or just real passionate.

With the older MPAs, I find that they aren't necessarily more passionate but there is usually more mileage.

H.M.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I cant' help wondering how "passionate" an MPA can be after
seeing more than 3 or 4 clients in a row!
The "show" must go on!

 

[D Aravah - JBC]

I have seen and thoroughly enjoyed the entire "Breaking the magicians' code" TV series ran by FOX network a couple of years back. I was able to crack a couple of David Copperfield's magics by running slow mo on his show on tape subsequently. Despite all that, I still enjoy watching, and would pay good bucks for, good magic shows.