Rev: Mystique

[Bilge Rat]

Went at Mystique few days ago after reading some reviews. They put me through their introduction routine described in other threads, but the lady was very polite and accomodating.

They only had two girls working. Chose Tracy (not sure about the name). Quoted me 190 for the hour or 165 for the half. Opted for the full hour since the price difference is not that high.

Beatiful burnette, Tracy has gorgeous tits and a nice slim body. I was offered a shower along with a fresh towel. A nice surprise since in the previous threads I understand no such option was offered.

Tracy was pleasant to speak to. She offered to start with a massage, but that was quite lame. Extensive exploring of her body was allowed, except digits or kisses. After a few minutes she mounted a condom on me and started a CBJ.

We then moved to cowgirls and missionary. Multiple positions were allowed. She used lubricant to get the things started. No kissing at all but she was quite cooperative during the event. She was so hot looking I ended a little earlier than I would usually want. After that I took a shower and talked with her. Spent there around 45 minutes in all.

I liked it cause I am the kind of paranoid guy who not only does not do any DATY, BBBJ, Kisses, etc, but I am also quite reluctant to work with girls who engage in such activities.

So if you are like me and like a super safe and super clean experience with stunning looking civilised girls then Mystique is for you. If you are in other high contact activities then you will sure not like the place.

Enjoy

 

[Natalie]

" I liked it cause I am the kind of paranoid guy who not only does not do any DATY, BBBJ, Kisses, etc, but I am also quite reluctant to work with girls who engage in such activities."

hmm, you call going to an MP and having cbj, cfs "work"? geez, what do you do when it's time to play?
ng

 

[Jay T (UK)]

It is very obvious to me that JBL is a Mystique Shill. Tracy is the sex artist formally known as Rene previously reviewed here.

Review Rene (Mystique) .

Loose times at Mystique

 

[manny]

Theres that word again.

Am i missing something? I read both reviews and found no reason based on them that JBL's review is a shill. JBl's review sounds favourable like providerboys. I understand that Tracy/Rene was found guilty of shilling on eforum.xxx, although i have no recollection of it. You can't be accussing a reviewer of shilling just because the SP herself was accused of the offence. Thats not enough basis. There must be other info that i'm not aware of. Can anyone share what inside knowledge they have....if any? --- Kev

 

[Pompal 09.]

i found this site a great source of super valuable info for some time now, and i felt obliged to candidly share

could care less whether some people have doubts about my review, my motivations or my way of “playing”

hope at least some of you guys will find it useful

and BTW YMMV

regards

 

[StrawDog]

Don't take it to personal jbl, your new and thats they way it is around here unfortunately with some to scream shill. They don't post why, and know one confronts them. --- Kev

 

[Cody j]

I said it before and I'll say it again I think people are too quick to accuse a new reviewer of being a shill. Why not sit back and take a wait and see approach to get a better idea of whether the person is actually a shill or just a newbie who may end up becoming a good source of info if people don't chase them away first.

Stating that he paid for the hour then going on to say that he only got 45 minutes isn't very good shilling if he is a shill. I didn't get the impression this person was shilling. If they are a shill for the agency they aren't very good at it, as it didn't make me want to pay a visit. Basically he stated she is a good looking MPA with lots of restrictions and you don't even get all the time you pay for.

 

[Shay P]

.......with all do respect you are wrong. There is nothing that tells me that this review is shilling.....nothing. To make that statement you would have to have other knowledge, other than what is posted here. Now if someone can prove that, things would be different. --- Kev

 

[Pompal 09.]

Welcome,

I guess the boys here read the review and found it to sound as if this Tracy wrote it. It does ring the way when I hear myself reading it. With all the mention of no kissing allowed and such.

I am not here to cast judgement because even if you are Tracy the review shows that the SP in question is not my type! I prefer all the stuff that Tracy does not allow. So to me who cares!

Just for fun though, can you tell us about some of the other girls you have seen? Credibility goes with the number of reviews you have put up.

MP