Review: BP Massage Rita

[viv]

Date: 1/28/12
Provider: Rita
Phone: 832-715-5843
Email Address: -
URL / Website: -
City: Houston
State: Texas
Address: 1960/45
Appointment Type: -
Activities: FBSM SEE ROS, YMMV (Seriously)
Session Length: 90
Fee: $.6
Hair Length and Color: Blonde
Age: 35
Smoking Status: I Couldn't Tell
Ethnic Background: White/Caucasian
Physical Description: Blonde, Slender, pretty face and body
Recommendation: Yes

 

[Dom Kane]

Where to begin?

First you forgot the link. From the clues given this appears to be the ad in question: http://houston.backpage.com/TherapeuticMassage/great-massage-by-europian-therapist/12710316

You need to be careful about posting reviews from the therapeutic section, because if she is a LMT then you should not be posting a review at all. Someone else correct me if I am wrong, but it was my understanding that LMTs are off limits on reviews due to it putting their liscense at risk.



Hope this helps.

 

[snowbison]

missinglink is right
The old ASPD had a no LMT review policy
If nothing else they will come in and nitpick and run fines up to $$$$

 

[Kenny]

i am missing something ... what was the point of this review?

 

[Scabs]

Again, if reviews keep getting posted in North Harris County (I45N corridor) for "spas" with LMT's and "No Extras" policies, then there will not be any available in no time.

Whether it is a board policy or not, it is "shooting yourself in the foot."

Use PM's on inquiries.

 

[[s0_ap]]

 

[sweetsinger]

What activities, please?

 

[Makayla]

I wouldn't review LMT's just as an un-needed risk to them and their license status.
Please PM me any interesting details, as I've been curious about this one.

 

[Tristan]

I don't review LMT's either but if they ask for the review I will but only then. I think most find that it only causes them problems and wished they had not done the review but by then the damage is done.

 

[TJR]

Carkiddo, your avatar seems almost too appropriate for that remark.

Double dog dare ya.

 

[*:]$un$hine[:*%]

My opinion is the reveiwer is suspect.

 

[Pompal 09.]

Don't waste your money. She is not the one in that picture. She had another ad with her 20 year younger picture. Fully clothed and not willing with touching.