should we introduced extirpated species back to california?

[Nunu]

Should we introduced extirpated species back into california like the jaguars, grey wolves, and grizzly bears and take out the introduced species so that way we could keep track on the animals to help keep the population growing and hope that they survive, i'm thinking that we should introduced extirpated species that we're wiped out in some parts of the world and put them back into their former range like grizzlies, wolves, and jaguars use to roam in parts of california and parts of america that they we're extirpated out of and we should bring them back to help conversation efforts and try to take/wipe out species that we're introduced to places in the world that they do not belong to at all, i've even read something online that said that lions, cheetahs, and elephants may be roaming the wilds of america in the future like they once did during the ice age era and also to help keep their populations growing and they were thinking about building a ice age national park for the animals but i'm thinking that's a bad idea since american lions, cheetahs, and elephants have long gone extinct and they wouldn't be able to survive the wilds of america unless their in a zoo, circus, sanctuary, as pets, or anything captivity related, etc. so who agrees that we should put native species back into the habitats that they were wiped out of and take out the introduced species and put them back where they belong.

 

[Ralph 124c41]

Communities evolve just as so individual species. This is not a question that the word "should" applies to. The only way you can apply human value judgement is to first define the goal. So, until the resulting community is well defined, the question is ill applied.