Silent Cinderella

[sav]

saw both Ruby and Scarlet a while back. Ruby was not as attractive as her picture, and had bolt ons. But she was very accommodating and did what you wanted to do.
Scarlet was much more attractive. Her face is probably one of the most "perfect" that I've seen. She is very toned, and not as voluptuous as her pictures may indicate. She didn't have huge breasts, I think they were fake, not too perky. The main issue with her, is her english is really horrible, she couldn't understand anything I said and at the same time, maybe because she's been in the business for a long time, she seemed a bit annoyed at me, whenever I try to say something to her. Overall, she didn't really get into it, perhaps some people have better chemistry with her?

Summary
Ruby 6 / 10
Scarlet physically 8/10, GFE 3/10

I would try scarlet at least once, just for the experience of banging a hot chick though.

 

[Old Mister Happy]

Will resist the urge to say "I told you so," but in any event Scarlet is back on the roster. Will look forward to your review...

 

[dog]

hows ruby anybody

 

[insider]

they need to move to a non-doorman building

 

[Mr Frazier]

Has anyone seen Katy? Also did they raise the price back to $400?

 

[Nix]

I saw Gisele and I guess she's YMMV. No attitude problems and it was actually one of the best sessions I've had in a while - hot and heavy and she was really into it. Granted, she wasn't doing the whole "I'm a slut and I'll do anything for you" routine right off the bat and it took a bit of work, but the end product was definitely worthwhile. The thing with the upsell to BBJCIM on the 1/2 hour rate is apparently an issue with the house and not with her. The thing with the phone girl - yeah, I had some communication issues, too; her phone manner could definitely use some improvment. I definitely agree that you had a bad experience and it was not called for. Anyway, I write because in my view she has the potential to be an ATF-type. I don't want folks to miss out on her for reasons that don't have anything to do with the provider herself. Sure, ideally you shouldn't have to risk a house policy that includes upsell and phone girl communication issues just to see a provider, and sure, if you get the lower end of YMMV that may be a raw deal. But believe me, the higher end of YMMV with this girl is definitely worthwhile. Anyway, just my two cents.

 

[hrslismys]

I've had mixed results with Aphrodite over the years. The latest catastrophe was a girl with amazing reviews (9s and 10s across the board), which turned out to be B&S. I couldn't believe it. Her name was Lilly and is still on their schedule.

I have found that Silentcinderella, while at times uses fake photos, have at times produced absolute gems. I remember Yuki and Vivi back in 2010. I did doubles with them. I stared in awe the first time I walked into their apartment -- both young tiny little things dressed in little bikinis, beautiful makup and hair, looked like little barbie dolls, ready for some sucking and fucking. That remains to this day my best session at this, or any KGFE place.

 

[iuecvufuismicjejk]

There are some higher priced girls that pop up on Eros. I can not justify $500 for two pops with a working girl. Maybe I am wrong but I have had some very good girls for $300.

The other thing is you HAVE TO BE WILLING TO WALK if its not to your liking. Thats a lot of coin to drop on "just ok" IMHO

God I miss Heeya from HGITC

 

[SETHPJ]

totally agree with bigguy. i think there needs to b a higher standard among some of us. i walked on two aphrodite girls even though they had amazing reviews on here. sara and katie. maybe because im young i dont wanna spend my hard earned money on someone subpar

 

[Day of the Bees]

there really isn't i suppose other than in my own mind. i consider asiangoldenflowers and korean-delight as the better of the KGFE places. the rest is a notch below in my opinion (of course, you can find some gems here but many of the girls are bleh either attitude/servicewise or looks)

 

[Jasmine B.]

bigguy... I think you meant higher end no? If there are higher end Kgfe brothels out there other then these 300-400 dollar ones, i dont know about them.

 

[oxybritydrict]

Has the bar been risen? It was 300-400 before, are there 400-500 places now. Should we expect dinner to be served at our arrival?

 

[Chia Obama]

I wasn't aware there were higher-end KGFE places around here.

 

[The Stubborn One]

you can forget about the customer service with most of these places (meaning the lower end KGFE places like sexykorea, apcdolls, massageplanets, silent cinderella). if you get a dud, you are pretty much screwed out of your money and they will never do anything to make it up to you. it's interesting because in korea, customer service as a whole (whether in anmas and room salons or just a regular retail department store) is soooooo much better.

 

[elguy81]

no...it would've been $400 total ($300 + 100).

 

[.Katastrophe Kat.]

Damn... that would really piss me off. Your right. I have been lucky. I wonder who the actual owner is. I wonder if Will knows from Eden.

 

[Aguavanalo]

at least with the photoshopping. But with at least 5 providers over the last 18 months or so, I've been baited and switched with false pictures. I think for this price you can opt to blur out girls faces-but it should be the same person. I only brought it up because of the recent Angel is Erin switch. I saw "Angel" in the summer, the same gal in the pics and was psyched to see her again. Lo and behold it's Erin, and when complaining to the mamasan saying "I want Angel, not Erin" she tells me sorry, Erin is Angel now. For $400 i do expect a bit more service than that kind of nonsense.

 

[Yadira from LA]

I have been here MANY times. I must say... never had an issue, always left happy. Could very well be the 1/2 hour thing. Actually, i think the talent here has consistently been really good and somewhat less photoshopped then the other high end Asian brothels.

 

[Zach Will]

Should include a BBBJCIM.

 

[ruissvac]

So, the total damage is 450 (350 + 100), correct??