On another message board I frequent, this topic has come up, and has been getting many opinions from posters. Though I was not the OP for this topic on the other message board, and I might possibly be off on some of the information I've gathered, I thought I'd bring it here and see how you all would like to opine:The topic was about the AZ. franchise, Massage Envy. http://www.massageenvy.com/ There was a story about it in a recent issue of Massage Magazine (the issue w/ the hikers as the cover story, I believe). What they do, apparently, is offer the first massage at $29.95, then the client purchases a membership, and pays $49 a month which includes one massage and 50% off all additional massage services and products. Without a membership and after the first time, the massage is competively priced at $60. As far as I know, they do not work with medical insurance claims/billing, but I could be wrong. They have up to 25 or so therapists employed (as independant contractors), and they also do outcalls. There are many hours available to work every week. The story says the therapists earn $22 per hour, but it really breaks down like this: The therapist earns $15 per massage, $6 if they can convince the client to purchase a membership, and $1 every time the client comes back. Oh, all the tips they earn as well (how big could a tip on $29.95 be?). And remember, as an I.C., no benefits. Massage Envy typically goes to the massage schools and recruits their employees. The downside to this for the client is that most therapists would have little to no prior experience.The popular opinion on the other board is that this stinks for a variety of reasons. Some say it's like Walmart's business strategy (corner the market and drive the little guys out of business by offering below market prices, then offer to bail the little guy out by giving them a job for slave wages). Therapists earning low untaxed wages would have to pay taxes on their earnings, but with very few write-offs, so their final wages are actually much lower and paltry to today's living standards. Also, I feel that therapists faced with having to struggle to pay their bills might be more likely to act unethically in order to earn extra income. The therapist builds no equity, works very hard to bring in enough income to live just below standard, and if he/she gets injured and can't work, good luck and goodbye.If this franchise continues to grow and gain popularity, independant therapists may find the need to reduce their fees in order to stay competitive. This could mean a reduced standard of living for those who have worked hard to get where they are. The first time the franchise gets busted for "happy endings", it is sure to make national news. This could give the entire massage industry a black eye, setting us back many years, and once again giving the impression to the public that massage therapists are little more than glorified prostitutes. I would like hearing comments from everyone, including those that live/work in AZ or TX, where the majority of the franchises are located, as well as those who are employed or have been employed by this company. I'd especially like to know what therapists living in these areas have experienced in their businesses, and if this company has affected their business in any way. I, too, am under the opinion that this stinks. How do you opine?