SURREYS treat of the week!!!!!

[Xeriena]

So I just got back from Lotus in surrey and let me tell you , I have found surreys secret. She is about 5'5 and she has smokin ass and truly the nices set of tits that I have ever seen!! The bonus is that she is young (19!) and just started working, so you know what that means "shes tight".
Her service was a 10 and her prices were reasanable I stayed for a hour and I had a well relaxed and VERY enjoyable time.
SHES A BORN NATUREL. I would have to say that i will be back to visit NICOLE for a second round. Take my advice chek her out at lotus in surrey.

 

[Jon R]

I am not prone to this sort of thing, but my spidey senses are tingling like crazy on this one. If this were Southpark, I'd call "Shannanigans."

But since this is not Southpark, its eforum.xxx, I guess I have to call this a "Shill."

This is the members very first post and only been a member since November. Full of blatant advertising type language, as in "Surrey's Secret," "the nicest tits I have ever seen,", "she's tight," "prices were reasonable," and "check her out at Lotus in Surrey." Plus her name is in all block letters.

All of the above says one thing: this is an unpaid ad and therefore, a shill.

Sorry, DaddyBigBucks. I think you are somehow connected to Lotus or you are actually Nicole. Do a better job disguising this, next time. You didn't even make this one difficult. This is obviously a shill. Come on, challenge us! Make it harder to catch you.

 

[Mamta]

i gotta agree with AM on this one.

 

[justagirl]

Me too.

The Rookie

 

[jr1972]

Yep. Shill.

 

[Captain Awesome]

Shilly Willy!!!!

 

[Steve D]

Hey Stupid! Yeah you! You're not fooling anyone... so why bother? How could you think anyone would be fooled? You didn't even try to disguise what you're doing. Yeah, you're stupid alright. Really really stupid. Doesn't it bother you that your stupidity shows easily? No, you're too stupid to let it bother you. Stupid!

 

[Shay ley ley]

S.H.I.L.L

shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill shill

 

[Pompal 09.]

C'mon guyS this migHt be an honest review of hIs experience, but it is just a LittLe suspicious.....

 

[jerry]

So, daddy BIG biucks, what are you doing going to "reasonably priced" girls if you're so rich?
I would think that you'd be splurging on some of the grade-A talent.

 

[??Savannah??]

Hey Herb, DaddyBIGBucks was so thrilled with NICOLE that he's going back to see her again !!! Just like he says in his post !!! That's where all his money will be going..........he wouldn't lie to us would he ???

The Rookie

 

[Shyam]

does he actually think we're so stupid to think this is a review instead of pure advertising?
what a fucker!

 

[Rammie]

Wow...glad everyone is in agreement!

 

[Finnegan Vegan Again]

I'm slipping

 

[wildy]

A rather rude retort. You could have simply made reference to the "Annie" inspired screen name - not something a pooning male might use It is hard to believe that most women cannot disguise themseleves when writing about sex - the feminine psyche almost always shows through Perhaps she deserves a wagging finger followed by a big "DUMBASS" shouted from the gallery

 

[Tristan]

I wonder if daddyBIGbucks, he of he one-post track record, will come back to enlighten us further.
Stay tuned.

 

[gothie_rex]

it's a shill

 

[Average Mike]

chill guys. DBB is obviously an amateur at shilling. now i wonder if he is going to respond? or have we fingered him red-handed?

euradog

 

[mystic_eye_cda]

This is a very unnecessary comment. Calling someone a shill is one thing, but this is waaaaaay over the lines of decency.


Take two steps back, take a deep breath and relax. Its okay. Its only a shill.

 

[Ryan / Stumpy]

How does everyone "know" that this is a shill?

Because he signed up recently?

Because this was his first post?

Because the review lacked the steamy details and was very positive for the SP?

Hmmm...

What if...

...he signed up recently because he just found out about eforum.xxx?

...he's only made one post because he's afraid of being ridiculed further?

...he's economical with words, a poor writer, doesn't read Penthouse and only writes short but to the point reviews?


More importantly...


What if he's right?

Can anyone who has seen her, refute this claim?