I am always skeptical of such numbers being thrown around as facts. How did the researchers arrive at these numbers? Often they are including unproven cases, calling them undiagnosed, but insisting that they must exist. Scientists have been fudging HIV/AIDs numbers for over 20 years just to maintain government attention and research dollars. When I was in high school in the 1980s my high school class was told with certainty that 1 in 3 of us would likely contract AIDS in our lifetimes. I think I have heard of 2 people from my class that actually have or had AIDS out of over 300 of us- and at least one of them was openly gay.
1 in 125 is still less than 1% prevelance- my math sucks but isn't that .8%. That is lower than some countries we mongers know and love, such as the DR and Thailand, which are just over 1%. It is about comparable to Brazil or the U.S., which both hover at around .06%. Keep in mind that in urban areas in the U.S. like LA, specifically with regard to sex workers, the rate can be as high as 2-3%. Mexico generally has an extremely low HIV incidence rate (.03%) so TJ is more in line with Southern California than the rest of Mexico- which makes a lot of sense. Check out this chart:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate
Also factor in that these numbers do not tell what perceneforum.xxxe of the infections are among gays and IV drug abusers. The number is probably above 70% of these cases are gays/bisexuals (aka MSM or "men who have sex with men"). Another 10-20% are probably IV drug abusers (specifically heroin and meth users). HIV in the US is on the rise paricularly among young gay men who do not use condoms. There may be some spillover of this phenomenon in TJ from LA/Southern California as 75% of TJ gays have had sex with gringos.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/resources/factsheets/msm.htm
Also keep in mind that all of the data about heterosexual men contracting HIV from straight sex is questionable. These numbers are generated based on self-reporting by the infected people. So when a guy is told he is HIV positive the health workers next ask him who he has had sex with in his life. Of course, many men on "the down low" and closeted gays/bisexuals, especially many macho men who are jailhouse queens and the like, report that the exposure probably happened with a female prostitute or random heterosexual hookup. The researchers don't mind this obvious lie because they get more false stats to scare you and me with. In reality the talk of heterosexual HIV/AIDS is used (rightfully so) to scare women from having unprotected sex with high risk men (bisexuals and junkies) because these guys have anal sex with women and that creates a heterosexual AIDS problem.
This is especially relevant in third world countries, especially in Africa,where the societies claim to have no gays (yeah right- they have a lot of closeted gays) and anal sex is often used as a form of birth control by as many as 50% of straight couples. It seems to me that the story of heterosexual AIDS is that bisexual guys go to the gay bathhouse or club, get ass fucked by a man then go home and pack the wife's or girlfriend's fudge. Meanwhile male meth addicts shoot junk with dirty needles then sodomize the old lady and wham. Crack whores and meth whores take it bareback up the ass from a bisexual man for a $20 fix and wham. In every case now they both have AIDS. and if you are the next guy to fuck the diseased bitch then you are playing russian roulette with your johnson.
Read some of the scientific literature to see what I mean. This is just a sample of the many different issues involved. It is a real eye opener.
http://www.webmd.com/news/20060918/many-straight-men-have-gay-sex
http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/382.html
http://www.aegis.com/news/wb/1999/WB990901.html
http://www.garynull.com/documents/Continuum/DissentingViewAnalSex&AIDS.htm
1 in 125 is still less than 1% prevelance- my math sucks but isn't that .8%. That is lower than some countries we mongers know and love, such as the DR and Thailand, which are just over 1%. It is about comparable to Brazil or the U.S., which both hover at around .06%. Keep in mind that in urban areas in the U.S. like LA, specifically with regard to sex workers, the rate can be as high as 2-3%. Mexico generally has an extremely low HIV incidence rate (.03%) so TJ is more in line with Southern California than the rest of Mexico- which makes a lot of sense. Check out this chart:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_HIV/AIDS_adult_prevalence_rate
Also factor in that these numbers do not tell what perceneforum.xxxe of the infections are among gays and IV drug abusers. The number is probably above 70% of these cases are gays/bisexuals (aka MSM or "men who have sex with men"). Another 10-20% are probably IV drug abusers (specifically heroin and meth users). HIV in the US is on the rise paricularly among young gay men who do not use condoms. There may be some spillover of this phenomenon in TJ from LA/Southern California as 75% of TJ gays have had sex with gringos.
http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/topics/msm/resources/factsheets/msm.htm
Also keep in mind that all of the data about heterosexual men contracting HIV from straight sex is questionable. These numbers are generated based on self-reporting by the infected people. So when a guy is told he is HIV positive the health workers next ask him who he has had sex with in his life. Of course, many men on "the down low" and closeted gays/bisexuals, especially many macho men who are jailhouse queens and the like, report that the exposure probably happened with a female prostitute or random heterosexual hookup. The researchers don't mind this obvious lie because they get more false stats to scare you and me with. In reality the talk of heterosexual HIV/AIDS is used (rightfully so) to scare women from having unprotected sex with high risk men (bisexuals and junkies) because these guys have anal sex with women and that creates a heterosexual AIDS problem.
This is especially relevant in third world countries, especially in Africa,where the societies claim to have no gays (yeah right- they have a lot of closeted gays) and anal sex is often used as a form of birth control by as many as 50% of straight couples. It seems to me that the story of heterosexual AIDS is that bisexual guys go to the gay bathhouse or club, get ass fucked by a man then go home and pack the wife's or girlfriend's fudge. Meanwhile male meth addicts shoot junk with dirty needles then sodomize the old lady and wham. Crack whores and meth whores take it bareback up the ass from a bisexual man for a $20 fix and wham. In every case now they both have AIDS. and if you are the next guy to fuck the diseased bitch then you are playing russian roulette with your johnson.
Read some of the scientific literature to see what I mean. This is just a sample of the many different issues involved. It is a real eye opener.
http://www.webmd.com/news/20060918/many-straight-men-have-gay-sex
http://www.whatisaids.com/wwwboard/messages/382.html
http://www.aegis.com/news/wb/1999/WB990901.html
http://www.garynull.com/documents/Continuum/DissentingViewAnalSex&AIDS.htm