Hi everyone,
still on the subject of case studies.
Often my clients have areas on their feet (lung area for example) which are full of very tough, thickand lumpy sectionsunder the skin. These areas are much too dense and think to work on and I always feel as if they are more of a chiropody problem than a reflexology concern, so I work around them.
If Icome acrossbubbly or gritty areas however I treat those as waste deposits and I work the area.
But it dawned on me yesterday that perhaps this is not correct? Perhaps the areas I avoid are worth working on? I cannot imagine it being possible to break down such dense tissue, but I need to know if I should be aiming to do so.
Does anyone have any advice?
Many thanks,
Loopy x
still on the subject of case studies.
Often my clients have areas on their feet (lung area for example) which are full of very tough, thickand lumpy sectionsunder the skin. These areas are much too dense and think to work on and I always feel as if they are more of a chiropody problem than a reflexology concern, so I work around them.
If Icome acrossbubbly or gritty areas however I treat those as waste deposits and I work the area.
But it dawned on me yesterday that perhaps this is not correct? Perhaps the areas I avoid are worth working on? I cannot imagine it being possible to break down such dense tissue, but I need to know if I should be aiming to do so.
Does anyone have any advice?
Many thanks,
Loopy x