yeah, I don't see why we all would "move on" ... btw, I never said I would : )
The scenario here is our favourite MPA. Think of your favourite MPA and how much she has satisfied your needs and desires. The fact is that nothing about your perception of heshe has changed, aside from the fact that you now know she was once a man. What's the difference ? It's purely psychological.
So, if that's the case, is our attraction to women far more psychological than it is related to our perception through the senses ?
It can't be, right ? I mean, we are primarily in this to satisfy physical desires, no ? And if that's the case, those who objectify more-so than those who lean toward a more "romanticised" (humanistic) outlook, should have the least problem finding out the object of their lust is actually a male.
yeah, I'm bored