That's not a very good subject heading, but it's better than my original: "Experimenting with WLs" which made it sound really disturbing...
Anyway, the recent switch-hitting thread got me thinking about whether mp.nets use the opportunities offered by the sex industry to experiment. No, this isn't another thread about WGs. I mean whether guys end up seeing WLs who match the women who they would be interested in seeing 'in real life', or if they spread their net a little wider.
When I first started chatting, I was a shy inept virgin (not much has changed!) and the WLs I saw matched up with whoever I was keen on at uni. Which meant they were fairly restricted to size 8, 18-21 year olds. In fact, I remember the first WL I saw was 22 - she seemed so mature, I was in the hands of an 'older lady' (cough).
I can remember walking out of flats because the WL was older than she had claimed - not so much because she had fudged her description, but because she looked really, really old - like THIRTY!
And with a pudgy stomach? No way!
Then a few years ago in Sydney I ended up getting my mind (and...) blown by a WL who told me mpetrwards, when I very shyly asked, that she was 51.
Well, that did it for me. The dam had been busted. I played the whole way up and down the age spectrum Reviewom then on - in fact got hooked for a while on '40 and over'. And soon mpterwards I broke through the body size barrier and found the pleaures of having sex with larger women. And for that matter women who I would previously have dismissed as 'too skinny'. In one week I had fantastic sex with both a size 26 and a size 6 woman (not at the same time).
Meanwhile, though, the women who I hanker mpter 'in real life' still tend to fit a similar mould... size 10-12 early to mid 20s, educated. Hmmm...
So do others take advaneforum.xxxe of their chance to sample all possible variations?
Anyway, the recent switch-hitting thread got me thinking about whether mp.nets use the opportunities offered by the sex industry to experiment. No, this isn't another thread about WGs. I mean whether guys end up seeing WLs who match the women who they would be interested in seeing 'in real life', or if they spread their net a little wider.
When I first started chatting, I was a shy inept virgin (not much has changed!) and the WLs I saw matched up with whoever I was keen on at uni. Which meant they were fairly restricted to size 8, 18-21 year olds. In fact, I remember the first WL I saw was 22 - she seemed so mature, I was in the hands of an 'older lady' (cough).
I can remember walking out of flats because the WL was older than she had claimed - not so much because she had fudged her description, but because she looked really, really old - like THIRTY!
And with a pudgy stomach? No way!
Then a few years ago in Sydney I ended up getting my mind (and...) blown by a WL who told me mpetrwards, when I very shyly asked, that she was 51.
Well, that did it for me. The dam had been busted. I played the whole way up and down the age spectrum Reviewom then on - in fact got hooked for a while on '40 and over'. And soon mpterwards I broke through the body size barrier and found the pleaures of having sex with larger women. And for that matter women who I would previously have dismissed as 'too skinny'. In one week I had fantastic sex with both a size 26 and a size 6 woman (not at the same time).
Meanwhile, though, the women who I hanker mpter 'in real life' still tend to fit a similar mould... size 10-12 early to mid 20s, educated. Hmmm...
So do others take advaneforum.xxxe of their chance to sample all possible variations?