Why are atheists more likely to chat?

[That guy]

9 out of 10 questions asked by atheists=chat
9 out of 10 questions asked by theists=genuine inquiries

Explain why.

 

[Greg Plowboy]

cause they gots nobody to talk too!

 

[Diogenes]

On what research do you base your claim?

 

[†John M â€]

I believe since they have no God to chat with, they are more lonely, and thus will chat more in Yahoo.

 

[David H]

If that's true, then why are 90% of my violation notices for chatting?

 

[Acid Zebra]

10 of of 10 questions asked by trolls = trolls.

 

[The Buddhist Swastika]

When you hear about Catholic's Love Affairs with Donkeys, ya just can't help it:
http://www.prosebeforehos.com/video-of-the-day/05/14/donkey-love/

You want genuine, here's genuine.

The God-belief, however, is placed in the same category as those morally destructive wrong views which deny the karmic results of action, assume a fortuitous origin of man and nature, or teach absolute determinism. These views are said to be altogether pernicious, having definite bad results due to their effect on ethical conduct.

God-religions offer no salvation without God. Thus a man might conceivably have climbed to the highest pinnacle of virtue, and he might have led a righteous way of life, and he might even have climbed to the highest level of holiness, yet he is to be condemned to eternal hell just because he did not believe in the existence of God. On the other hand, a man might have sinned deeply and yet, having made a late repentance, he can be forgiven and therefore 'saved'. From the Buddhist point of view, there is no justification in this kind of doctrine.

The word "atheism" carries the innuendo of an attitude countenancing moral laxity, or a belief that man-made ethics, having no divine sanction, rest on shaky foundations. For Buddhism, however, the basic moral law is inherent in life itself. It is a special case of the law of cause and effect, needing neither a divine law-giver nor depending upon the fluctuating human conceptions of socially conditioned minor moralities and conventions. For an increasing section of humanity, the belief in God is breaking down rapidly, as well as the accustomed motivations for moral conduct. This shows the risk of basing moral postulates on divine commandments, when their alleged source rapidly loses credence and authority. There is a need for an autonomous foundation for ethics, one that has deeper roots than a social contract and is capable of protecting the security of the individual and of human institutions. Buddhism offers such a foundation for ethics.

 

[Narx Pancake]

I like how you consider "Why does my priest like to bend me over" a genuine inquiry.

 

[Joseph]

with different ways of thinkin leads to desire to share..chat

 

[Michael]

All of your premises=false.

 

[Wandering Stranger]

I have to agree with the first answer.

 

[Everard J]

You made that up...
~