Susiepolls2008
Member
- Joined
- Jan 9, 2010
- Messages
- 57
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 6
Dawn Johnsen on the heels of an attack? Here's why I think the Johnsen nomination should be derailed. Over the next four to eight years, the Justice Department will repeatedly be asked to advise on the legality of programs and measures designed to combat terrorism. It is important that the individuals providing this advice not err on the side of nixing these programs and measures. Otherwise, innocent lives probably will be lost and terrorists may well regain their momentum (recall, for example, that the Reno Justice Department nixed plans to take out Osama bin Laden).
There is strong reason to believe that Dawn Johnsen will consistently err on the side of protecting terrorists and denying the president the power to protect the nation. This fear is not based solely on her blogging; it also stems from her law review articles and, to a lesser extent, statements she has made or declined to make during the confirmation process.
For example, Johnsen has objected to warrantless surveillance of suspected al-Qaeda communications into and out of the United States
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/04/023339.php
There is strong reason to believe that Dawn Johnsen will consistently err on the side of protecting terrorists and denying the president the power to protect the nation. This fear is not based solely on her blogging; it also stems from her law review articles and, to a lesser extent, statements she has made or declined to make during the confirmation process.
For example, Johnsen has objected to warrantless surveillance of suspected al-Qaeda communications into and out of the United States
http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2009/04/023339.php