Why do I write about injury prevention?
BJB-LMP said:
Laurianne - have to admit that I have a reservation about your work, which is: have you ever gone back to work as a massage therapist? I ask because I have simply met too many MT-trained people who never really developed a practice but now make their living advising massage therapists how to go about things. Maybe this happens in all professions, but my guard is always up in this kind of situation. I know you don't owe me an explanation of your motives or experience. I also understand that compiling the injury experiences of other MTs is valuable and helpful to our profession. But I know I am not the only therapist who has wondered about this, and I would love it if you would be willing to chat us up a bit about it.
I'm actually glad you asked this question, because yes, it has been asked before (and usually in not as tactful a manner as you have asked it - thank you for that).
Yes, this happens in all professions, but somehow there is a resistance in the massage profession to the idea that someone can graduate from massage school and have a role in the profession other than actually doing massage. Luckily, I have been applauded by many more massage therapists for doing the work I do - taking my own painful experience with massage-related injury and using it to help others - than I have been criticized by others. I didn't give up massage by choice - I got too injured to practice (still am). This happens frequently to massage therapists - two other people in my class had the same experience.
I have often seen an attitude that I would call "false pride" among massage therapists that those who don't get injured are good, and those who do get injured and have to do something else in the field (like teach or write on the subject) are "bad". This is one of the attitudes that keeps people from speaking openly abuot injury and getting proper treatment (plus it's certainly not compassionate). Anyone can get injured, and thank goodness that those who do have many other options to use their hard-earned, expensive massage training to do some good for the profession.
I should point out also that I wrote Save Your Hands soon after I completed my massage training, so I did have the necessary training to discuss techniques. The book is also based on extensive consultation with physical therapists and other massage therapists who reviewed everything in it (Diana Thompson, head of the AMTA Foundation, was one of the editors of the book). The rest of my work is based on extensive research and my experiences working with hundreds of massage therapists in Save Your Hands workshops in the U.S. and Canada. Remember also that the book is about injury prevention - it's not a book on massage techniques based on a long history of working as a massage therapist, and there is nothing in the book that says that it is. Can you learn more about massage techniques from someone who has worked as an MT for many years? Sure. Can you learn more about avoiding injury from someone who was worked as an MT for many years but hasn't done the necessary research to truly understand injury prevention (a complex subject that goes WAY beyond good body mechanics)? I'm afraid not.
I must admit that it's been very difficult for me to be so sharply criticized (not by you, but by others), given that Save Your Hands was the first comprehensive book on injury prevention for MT's, and that my sole purpose in writing it was to help others avoid the same painful (3 years of treatment), career-destroying injury that I had suffered. I never expected the book to do well and still be selling 11 years later. The fact that it does still sell well shows that people find it helpful, which is great. If I have been successful with the book, one would think people would be happy that I was able to salvage something of the investment (a year and $8000 in student loans) I made in becoming a massage therapist.
My work has had an appreciable impact on the massage profession's acceptance and acknowledgement that injury happens in this profession. With my new collaborator, Rick Goggins, we worked for years to find a sponsor to allow us to do a study to get the first reliable statistics on work-related injury among massage therapists (work that the AMTA Foundation should have done years ago and never was interested in doing). When I first came out with the book and the workshops, there were schools that were vehemently opposed to the idea of talking about injury - if many schools now offer some kind of injury prevention or self-care training, it is in part due to my pioneering efforts. I was also the first person to write a self-care column in a major massage magazine. It's difficult to understand why anyone would have a problem with any of this.
Now I am writing a 2nd edition of the book, which will be out this year. I realize that I have been out of the field for over 10 years, and that yes, if I'm going to talk about the massage field, I no longer have enough first-hand knowledge of it to be credible. So I have two co-writers on this edition of the book. The first is Rick Goggins, who is a certified ergonomist and also a licensed massage practitioner. The second is Janet Peterson, who is an experienced, licensed physical therapist. Both are specialists in workplace injury. Between the three of us, we have a wealth of experience and expertise on the subject of work-related injury prevention in general, and in the manual therapies in particular.
It is possible to do research on a subject and write about it authoritatively - one doesn't need to be a steel worker to understand the risks of that profession and apply principles of ergonomics to give them suggestions on how to avoid injury. Yes, having first-hand experience is also very valuable, and that's why I now have collaborators for the 2nd edition of the book. But to have been criticized to the extent that I was criticized reflects more about a lack of understanding of this subject, and about the field of massage in general, than it reflects any shortcoming on my part in writing Save Your Hands. If people say "how dare you write about injury prevention when you can no longer work as an MT", I would say "how dare I NOT write about this subject when I had the ability to help people and change the profession as much as I have by my book, articles, and research study?" Not to blow my own horn, but it took guts to do what I did - admit to being injured in a profession that still thinks being injured is a sign of weakness or failure, and turn my own tragedy into something that has helped thousands of people to avoid having their own tragedy.
Choosing to do scholarly research work in the massage field is a noble, legitimate choice, just as it is in any field. "Those who can do, those who can't, teach" is a pretty unfair and untrue way of looking at things. Let's encourage more massage therapists, injured or not, to pursue whatever work in the field gives them pleasure and yes, rewards them financially for their investment and time in attending massage school.