Chat Derek Chauvin Guilty! Fuck yes!

[jimmyd]

Remember, CAMH is there for you. They are the only ones that can help your type of crazy.

Does CAMH have any programs for people who’d like to hurt others? You should look into it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Hornet]

Does CAMH have any programs for people who’d like to hurt others? You should look into it.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

If your feelings are hurt CAMH is there to help you. But this is a board for adults, no children here. If you aren’t man enough for a verbal fight, one that you started by the way, you shouldn’t be here as you are too fragile and dainty.

But, you keep on being you and “Be Best”

 

[Magicmon]

Please, do share your knowledge of Chauvin's long history of police abuse.

please share your knowledge on Floyd’s drug dealer.

 

[jimmyd]

If your feelings are hurt CAMH is there to help you. But this is a board for adults, no children here. If you aren’t man enough for a verbal fight, one that you started by the way, you shouldn’t be here as you are too fragile and dainty.

But, you keep on being you and “Be Best”

Nah, you couldn’t hurt my feelings. You’re the one who expressed a desire to fight me though.
A sign of a weak minded person.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[jimmyd]

please share your knowledge on Floyd’s drug dealer.

He wouldn’t testify, for one.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[sy barite]

please share your knowledge on Floyd’s drug dealer.

Man in car with George Floyd the day he died doesn't want to testify in Derek Chauvin trial - ABC News (go.com)

Here you go. That was very easy. Your turn.

As I said, if the prosecution had called this guy and offered immunity for his testimony, it would have undone or greatly weakened their case.

 

[sy barite]

I don’t know as I’m not a lawyer. But, both the Prosecution and Defence lawyers had the evidence that could have been leaked to, or shared with, the media. I could only assume they weren’t allowed to share it with the media otherwise Chauvin’s lawyer really dropped the ball on that one if it actually was exculpatory video evidence.

I'm not a lawyer either, but I don't think either of us have to be to understand what's happened. The complete video record was not widely shared because the media is fully complying with and even leading the narrative used by the Prosecution--namely that Chauvin killed Floyd asphyxiated Floyd by applying pressure to his neck with his knee. All evidence that cast doubt on that was ignored by the prosecution, which is actually understandable, but it should not have been ignored in the media. It's out there, search it out, watch it and see if it makes you wonder a bit.

 

[qinging]

I'm not a lawyer either, but I don't think either of us have to be to understand what's happened. The complete video record was not widely shared because the media is fully complying with and even leading the narrative used by the Prosecution--namely that Chauvin killed Floyd asphyxiated Floyd by applying pressure to his neck with his knee. All evidence that cast doubt on that was ignored by the prosecution, which is actually understandable, but it should not have been ignored in the media. It's out there, search it out, watch it and see if it makes you wonder a bit.

The defense had none....or just not up your level of natural litigious insight...or maybe they know the law and you are just a social media wannbe pundit headed in every direction but factual

 

[sy barite]

The defense had none....or just not up your level of natural litigious insight...or maybe they know the law and you are just a social media wannbe pundit headed in every direction but factual

Hi sweetie, I'll humour you and try to interpret your attempt at communicating..."had none" what?

 

[qinging]

Hi sweetie, I'll humour you and try to interpret your attempt at communicating..."had none" what?

The defense lacked a defense ...as your man Trump said...."we saw what we saw."

 

[sy barite]

Right, try to follow along. What I said was that opinions might have changed if people could have seen the whole video. This is called "learning" (lurn-ing)

 

[qinging]

Right, try to follow along. What I said was that opinions might have changed if people could have seen the whole video. The is called "learning" (lurn-ing)

Again you are making up a hypothetical as if relevant evidence....."what if " wasn't on trial....try and stick to the facts.

 

[sy barite]

Again you are making up a hypothetical as if relevant evidence....."what if " wasn't on trial....try and stick to the facts.

Ok. That's all the time I've got for you today. I can handle uninformed, boring and dim witted, but not all three at once wrapped in a single package.

 

[qinging]

Ok. That's all the time I've got for you today. I can handle uninformed, boring and dim witted, but not all three at once wrapped in a single package.

I'll be waiting for you.

 

[Magicmon]

Man in car with George Floyd the day he died doesn't want to testify in Derek Chauvin trial - ABC News (go.com)

Here you go. That was very easy. Your turn.

As I said, if the prosecution had called this guy and offered immunity for his testimony, it would have undone or greatly weakened their case.

OK so let’s get this straight you think Chauvins abuse history history doesn’t matter but you think Floyd’s alleged drug use history matters more?

 

[sy barite]

OK so let’s get this straight you think Chauvins abuse history history doesn’t matter but you think Floyd’s alleged drug use history matters more?

It isn't a choice of one or the other. The full facts of the story would have cast a different light on the death of Floyd. You asked me to share the particulars about how testimony from the drug dealer in the car could have done just that, and I did. Now it's your turn to explain how Chauvin's "history of abuse" would have had an effect the other way. I'm not trying to play "gotcha". You made a statement and I'm simply wondering if you have something to share about the complaints against Chauvin that's relevant to the discussion. I want to know what you know about Chauvin's past that I don't. Simple as that.

Oh, and there is nothing "alleged" about Floyd's drug use history.

 

[qinging]

It isn't a choice of one or the other. The full facts of the story would have cast a different light on the death of Floyd. You asked me to share the particulars about how testimony from the drug dealer in the car could have done just that, and I did. Now it's your turn to explain how Chauvin's "history of abuse" would have had an effect the other way. I'm not trying to play "gotcha". You made a statement and I'm simply wondering if you have something to share about the complaints against Chauvin that's relevant to the discussion. I want to know what you know about Chauvin's past that I don't. Simple as that.

Oh, and there is nothing "alleged" about Floyd's drug use history.

Ok so drug dealer in the car and this changes...

""Two autopsy reports — one by a private medical examiner commissioned by Floyd’s family and another by the Hennepin County Medical Examiner — reached the same conclusion: that Floyd died of homicide, meaning death at the hands of someone else"

 

[Magicmon]

No you asked me to share something that is already widely known. To put on an act that a documented fact is fiction.


Yes it is alleged because even the article you provided states it is. Just like the counterfeit $20 no one knows if it’s fake. The attendant just followed protocol on what he was supposed to do if he receives money that looks questionable. As he said on trial.

The Minneapolis police officer who knelt on George Floyd's neck had 18 previous complaints against him, police department says

The former Minneapolis police officer seen in a video with his knee on George Floyd's neck had 18 prior complaints filed against him with the Minneapolis Police Department's Internal Affairs, according to the police department.

www.google.com

 

[sy barite]

Which of the 18 complaints are you characterizing as "police abuse", because he was disciplined for only two? Is it perhaps the one where he ordered a woman out of the car? Is that the one you are thinking of? Please, share your specific insights, since even the article you posted does not say what the complaints were about. Or is it maybe that without knowing the substance of the complaints you characterized them as police abuse and now lack the character to admit you didn't know what the fuck you were talking about?

And no, you're unequivocally wrong about the drug history. It is NOT alleged, and the article I shared says no such thing. He went to jail for drugs, more than once I believe. There were drugs in his system when he died. He's on video saying he'd been "hoopin" Or are you going to contend that was a reference to basketball?

Here's Snopes, which has bent over backwards to be kind to Floyd. And we're arguing over drugs FFS every other charge is far worse. Background Check: Investigating George Floyd’s Criminal Record | Snopes.com

Have the balls to just admit you are wrong.

 

[Darke Steele]

It isn't a choice of one or the other. The full facts of the story would have cast a different light on the death of Floyd. You asked me to share the particulars about how testimony from the drug dealer in the car could have done just that, and I did. Now it's your turn to explain how Chauvin's "history of abuse" would have had an effect the other way. I'm not trying to play "gotcha". You made a statement and I'm simply wondering if you have something to share about the complaints against Chauvin that's relevant to the discussion. I want to know what you know about Chauvin's past that I don't. Simple as that.

Oh, and there is nothing "alleged" about Floyd's drug use history.

500 years of history prove that white people are nothing but blood thirsty, mass raping, genocidal racists.