mush said:
you would think differently if you were strictly mobile. so, yes the environment is part of the story.
the other part of the story is that there are plenty of men who 'screen' well on the phone, but think that anything can be negotiated behind closed doors.
As I mentioned "for the most part". And that "usually sole practitioners practices are built on referrals, so, in my experience it is rare that someone just walks in "off the street" or without knowing someone who has been to my office before".
I personally have had more people looking for "services I don't offer" in the spa environment with 40 + employees (hair, esthetics, nail, massage) than I ever have in private practice. I also do hotel calls, and with that I do use the concierege as my screener. I think I've had two men looking for extra services in 7 years of that practice.
I am not saying you shouldn't be careful or that environment doesn't play a factor. I think my words were misinterpreted.
So let me try to rephrase. In my experience as a therapist, and for many of the therapists I have run across during my time of practicing - I don't find that being a sole practitioner makes one experience men looking for "extra services" more frequently than when in practice in a larger environment. I certainly am not saying practitioners should not trust thier instincts or feel un-safe. By all means, do both.
From what I have experienced, many therapists who have a privately based practices, more often have referrals, and less frequently have "walk ins". I want to be clear that just because a client is going to a sole practitoner office, this should not be a reason that a client would think the worst will automatically be assumed of them. I certainly don't assume someone is coming to me for something other than therapeutic work.
Hope that helps clarify my post.