An apology and correction from us (yes, it can be done! LOL)

[Pompal 09.]

Hey guys....

We are writing this post in light of the controversy about our MUSES pictures/looks. After wracking our brains trying figure out how on earth people were seeing our gals as "fat" or "ugly" ... Well...we think we figured it out!!!


It came to our attention that on 2 versions of Fire Fox and Internet Explorer 6, our pictures appeared stretched out, (or as one client put it "like mirrors in a fun-house") AHHHH!! So we called our web guy right away and discussed it. He fixed our photo gallery this weekend.


We have asked a few folks to have a peak and everyone has said its 10times better!!


So we invite you to have a look-see!! www.musemassagespa.com/attendants/ Our new gallery should be rightly-proportioned, even faster to load each picture, and the resolution should better to eliminate pixelated images.


So, with humble apologies, we (especially me, Emily, the loud mouthed one) are sorry for the error. If anyone still notices any problems, please private msg us and let us know...we will be sure to fix it ASAP!! Again, sorry for our digital mistake and thanks for helping out !


Love,

Riley & Emily

 

[Veronika [:]

Honey, does my new JPEG make me look fat?

 

[rachel c]

brooklyn looks amazing!

 

[Leen]

Looks great. I am impressed.

 

[Prime]

They look the same to me as they always did. Load a bit faster maybe.

 

[yahoo-userx]

No matter what browser you are using, I have them all, girls like Bailey, Jade and Jazz are anything but fat.

 

[Bob G]

Was thinking the same thing.

 

[Rt Hon Alfy G Returns]

Brighter and sharper contrast for sure. I liked them before, I like them even better now!

 

[sazz]

I can't see how these minor changes (it does look sharper) will change the opinions of those from before.

 

[Stefan V]

I wasn't commenting on the appearance of the MPA's, just that the pictures look the same. Some of them look fine to me, some others wouldn't interest me. Same as any other spa with pictures.

 

[Leftfoot]

You edited your post. You originally quoted me so I thought you replying to what I said.

 

[God Speed]

Pics look exactly the same.

I think some expressed (in other threads) that the photographs did not capture the lady in a favourable pose, nor did the photos express the ladies' true personality.

 

[Elsie May]

Ill tell you what the problem is. Whoever the photographer is that set up a light directly above the models is a complete idiot. YOU NEVER DO THAT. It shows dimples, folds, cellulite. Thats why they all look flabby.

 

[Social Butterfly]

Usually photos make models etc look better than in real life. Of the MUSE attendants I've seen, they look better in real life than in the photos.

 

[Pompal 09.]

I think some of you are missing the point here.
I don't think the intent was to reopen the debate over who is beautiful and who isn't or who looks better in their pics than in real life or vice versa. I think the intent of the post was to acknowledge that some of the feedback our Muse ladies initially got about the pics was in fact well founded, especially by members who run certain software versions. It seems they had not seen the distorted pics an were wondering what teh nay-sayers were talking about.
Now they've rectified the problem. If the pics looked odd to you before, they should look ok now. If the pics looked ok to you before, they should still look ok.

 

[Serendipity2]

I hate to tell you this, but you need to hire a new photographer.

 

[joeyoverkill]

I agree 100%.

I'm a photographer at what I do and I have been telling Muse management this as often as I can on massageplanet.net when it comes to this subject. Nothing against you but the photographer Muse hired sucks, he uses one light for glamour photos?? Seriously??

 

[Mr.Klaus]

I like the look and style of these shots, much better than those for most agencies.