Are we damaging massageplanet.net 's reputation?
Seeing as Rev, is on vacation, I'm gonna hop off the fence for a moment. It's not a position I like, coz I can't see the other backyards and neighbours windows around me, but Rev's view is actually more in line with my own personal view. We just disagree somewhat as to the overall picture.
Although the quotes are pointing toward VBB, my thoughts are a general comment on all reviews, because that is where the issue really lies.
Rev questioned the motivation of the reviewer. What I question is the reader. Why do people feel the need to read details. I can understand that you want an accurate report on the session to make informed choices. No doubt, creative humorous [and explicit] reviews are more entertaining, but I don't totally get why, as clients, people seemingly need, require and want explicit details.
OK, here are two examples of my reviews. I use them because I'm lazy and it's easier for me to recollect my own reviews than those of others. Although maybe not creative or interesting, I think they do convey what a client needs to know and IMO represent an acceptable middle ground between "love letters" [although the Cameron one leans that way ... heheh] and penthouse forum. I'm sure there are more creative examples out there that say a lot without being too direct.
Mya, Angelina & Platinum
Cameron - HFH's Hidden Gem
On a side note, unless I'm losing my mind [which isn't beyond reason], one of my reviews appears to have been deleted, because it's theme, although not explicit, was based on the MPA being 'the bodyslide queen' and later that spa had a problem with bylaw and the mention of said activity in reviews, while at present there is no problem. So believe me when I say, I know how it feels to have reviews censored or deleted. If it were me I'd take a proactive approach against it, but as I say, that's just me.
So, tell me, is there really a critical difference between saying, "the essential requirements were there and she was very receptive to my oral advances" vs "we engaged in dfk and she seemed to respond to my awsum skills when I went down on her" ... You may well say that if there is no difference then why not post specific details openly, but there is a difference to an outsiders perception.
It seems to me that the more detailed a report is, the more it takes away from that element of intrigue, the unknown and the personal fantasy. I honestly don't need to read my fellow massageplanet.netites personification of their genitals and how well they were handled [unless you're doing a gay review ... heheh]. As a potential client trying to make a decision, the finish was creative, sensual and thoroughly explored is all I need to know regarding the MPA being reviewed. This example, although it could be more creative, is more in keeping with my idea of "pushing the limits", but doesn't cross "the line".