RE: MIAA
I met her once but had another girl booked, she went to the top of my TDL. Loved her look (and had also read that she provided DFK and BBBJ at the time). Made 3 appointments to see her over the summer and she didn't show up to work for any of them. That was my personal experience as to do w/ her reliability.
Got feedback from reception that the last few months at least Miaa's service took a complete nosedive (when she bothered to show up). She switched from DFK and BBBJ on top of FS, to that BS stripper menu of CBJ, no KISSING at all, and over-priced FS. As a result, she lost a TON of regulars (surprise, surprise?) and got distraught about it. For some reason she couldn't correlate why this happened. Just WOW, on the brain capacity, if this is accurate?
Overall, after reading the latest in this irrelevant drama explosion, I feel I dodged a bullet personally.
IMO, Seduction is a running a business w/ independent contractors who are free to choose elsewhere to work at any time.
To me, Miaa just comes off as a spoiled entitled narcissist who wants to have good money thrown at her for little to nothing in return. Good luck with that. (The grass isn't always greener on the other side, FYI)
It's my feeling, as Clients, we need to look out for what benefits US the most, first and foremost (Spa's can look out for themselves - while taking care of their customers, same w/ girls - they are free to go and work wherever and however they pls). The more rules and regulations a business has that are designed to make it better run for the customer, I'm personally all in favor for. Also, if when interviewing the girls, if a place like Seduction is stressing to them to offer DFK, BBBJ and FS, and stressing the tip ask needs to be 50/100, well who benefits from that? Us, the clients. As well as the spa, b/c it will generate repeat business and give the place a good reputation among clients, bringing even more business. The girls also are able to make steady bank. So it's Win, Win, Win in my eyes.
I'm not going there to waste my time and money (on some girl who will give me a garbage session w/ overpriced all covered, no kissing, extras). And these type of policies in my eyes just work to lower that risk while increasing the chance as a client you will get good value for your time and money.
Also, I've met her partner in crime Skarlett at the spa too. Let's just say, based on her appearance (face/body), you would have to pay me, and it would have to be a very high number, to have a session w/ her. And, I read on another post on this board (from a reliable reviewer) she was actually charging for DATY? This is the kind of thing and the type of attendants that need to be weeded out and gone from the spa. Having them there and operating like that hurts who? Again, us the clients, and secondly, the Spa itself, as those clients, with the more bad sessions they rack up there are less likely to do business w/ the spa itself. No thanks & good riddance. That's my peace.