sillypup said:
From your post it seems that you are on the business perspective and not the therapist perspective.
Of course R&R is posting from the business perspective and not the therapist perspective!! R&R is a business owner. Why on earth would they be posting from a therapist perspective?
I think R&R (particularly Mr R&R) have made many valuable contributions to this board FROM A BUSINESS OWNER'S perspective. There is absolutely nothing wrong with that, this board is full of people making a living from massage, business owners are just as entitled to be here as therapists, it's just that most business owners don't bother to do that. I can understand why, even if they found this place it's full of bash the business posts.
There is money to be made as a sole practitioner, there is money to be made as an IC/employee/multi-therapist partnership/room renter/ salons/etc, there is money to be made organising those people.
Without the glitzy spas out there, massage would have a much lower profile, there would be a much smaller market for therapists, and it's not from the jobs the glitzy spas create, it's from the public awareness than massage isn't some nudge nudge wink wink service, it can be something else. So many men say 'I couldn't tell my wife I had a massage'- they couldn't while it was the realm of the adult industry, but if their wife has a massage, it's ok for them to have one too. Spa fluff services have allowed therapeutic massage to grow as an industry to support more therapists. Not as many therapists as the massage schools churn out, but that's a different discussion.
If a business owner relies on one therapist for their business, they're a fool, no business owner and therapist could thrive based on the income from the one therapist. If one therapist leaves and the business falls apart, it means the business was falling apart before the therapist left.