I started commenting on Twitter in response to you asking me why Iโm not commenting on the Twitter examples you are throwing my way you fucking moron. You asked for a Twitter discussion dumbass.
If you think the world is without biases you are a lost cause. Iโve mentioned the cessation of the Fairness Doctrine which I responded to Sy barite about (go read it). Once that ended the biases that were already there exasperated further. Even then, that applied to traditional media and social media is uncharted territory. Fuck, even Zuckerberg went before Congress looking for guidance. Iโve also said I want it back but I recognize that is the playing field we play in. In 2016, Clinton lost and the right called the left cry babies. Now the right are bigger cry babies than the left ever was. Howโs that Arizona โauditโ coming and how many election fraud lawsuit did Trump win?
Trump incited an insurrection (those arrested charged even admitted to that in their defence), those private companies acted to stop the rhetoric that could cause it to happen again and that is well within their legal right to do. Trump will lose his lawsuit and youโll see because the first amendment doesnโt apply to private companies. Your big baby Trump couldnโt deal with losing an election fair and square as his ego couldnโt handle it. But his rhetoric is continuing to divide the country, caused an insurrection and now some of his followers are even saying that either heโs reinstated in August or there will be civil war. So social media private companies can do whatever they damn well please, if itโs within their legal rights, to stop that rhetorical to prevent more insurrections and violence. You are the one with a bug up his ass about Trump and the Twitter ban, so you want to argue his side, then argue it and donโt run away and hide saying you donโt have to argue his case. The mere fact you started commenting on it means you started arguing his side a d now you are running for cover. The burden in any case is on the complainant and not the defendant. But go ahead and retreat hoping Sy barite will come and rescue you. As for โwhat did he tweetโ specifically? If you had brains you could do your own damn research.
Suspension of @realDonaldTrump
blog.twitter.com
I donโt have a Pinterest account either so I donโt give a shit what they do. But this is probably your most laughable point yet. โCollusionโ? hereโs Rudy talking collusion
Now, this is so rich that your guy, that you defended, will use โcollusion is not a crimeโ as a defence when itโs in his favour then you use as an argument here that it is indeed a crime. Well, what is it? Is it a crime or not? Well, whatever it is you bringing it up is a clear โdouble standardโ. Did it even ever occur to you that it wasnโt collusion at all but independent, and
immediate, reactions to January 6th riots, and they all saw this was a result of Trumpโs rhetoric so they had to act quickly? No, because you yourself are completely biased and wonโt look at anything that doesnโt support your already entrenched view point.
That is a very rich statement โagreed by everyoneโ. You mean all 320 million Americans or just you and Sy barite because โeveryoneโsโ is not commenting here, just a few of us. Sybarite (no space) has been quiet in this discussion as it turned to Trump so why are you trying to drag him in. He doesnโt seem to me to be a guy afraid to speak his mind so if he wants to say something, Iโm sure he would. Even so, you now have to run and hide behind them because you canโt make you own case. โEveryoneโ here sees that is how you operate: yell, deflect, distract, retreat and hide behind sy barite. Fight your own fights coward.
I said he could call a press conference and the reporters could have a scrum and ask questions. They can also issue a statement. Not once did I say he should called CNN for an interview. Stop making shit up.