I had that discussion before: on paper, LE have to act on any illicit activities and legally, they won't have any hesitation to do so.
BUT, in reality, cops don't give a damn about MP, whatever the services offered. They have more important things to look after. As long as there's no trouble, cops won't do anything.
Trouble can be anything like:
Even if the formulation of some reviews might seem obvious, what's not said is not said and can't be presumed legally, unless backed by some known "translation". Everybody reporting getting FS in any parlor is providing such translation. The more corroboration is given to a "translation" the more solid it become. The more solid it become, the more risks actions will be taken.
Example? If I say "I'm going out to get some bread.": That's all it mean. I can say that sentence 1000 times, that's all it mean. But one day, I say it and my buddy replies "Be careful when you buy crack from this guy, he put garbage in it." Now somebody listening might equate "bread" to "crack". After a few times where people "slip" and use "crack" instead of "bread" in a conversation, anybody will know 100% that "bread" is in fact "crack". Make sense, right?
Now, back to reviews. I do not want anybody to reply to this post in this thread. Whoever does will get some time off.
If again (it's been done before...), somebody feels this can be discussed, open a thread in the lounge. I can tell you from the start, eforum.xxx point of view won't change so, if the goal of opening a new thread is to convince us to change our mind, don't waste any time on it.
Thanks
BUT, in reality, cops don't give a damn about MP, whatever the services offered. They have more important things to look after. As long as there's no trouble, cops won't do anything.
Trouble can be anything like:
- neighbor complaining,
- drugs,
- gangs,
- underage employees,
- illegal immigrants,
- slavery or,
- in cases like eforum.xxx, if somebody or a group of people rub the cop's noses in a situation non-stop and brag they can act illegally without the cops doing anything,
Even if the formulation of some reviews might seem obvious, what's not said is not said and can't be presumed legally, unless backed by some known "translation". Everybody reporting getting FS in any parlor is providing such translation. The more corroboration is given to a "translation" the more solid it become. The more solid it become, the more risks actions will be taken.
Example? If I say "I'm going out to get some bread.": That's all it mean. I can say that sentence 1000 times, that's all it mean. But one day, I say it and my buddy replies "Be careful when you buy crack from this guy, he put garbage in it." Now somebody listening might equate "bread" to "crack". After a few times where people "slip" and use "crack" instead of "bread" in a conversation, anybody will know 100% that "bread" is in fact "crack". Make sense, right?
Now, back to reviews. I do not want anybody to reply to this post in this thread. Whoever does will get some time off.
If again (it's been done before...), somebody feels this can be discussed, open a thread in the lounge. I can tell you from the start, eforum.xxx point of view won't change so, if the goal of opening a new thread is to convince us to change our mind, don't waste any time on it.
Thanks